Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 04;8:468. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00468. eCollection 2014.

Tracking orthographic learning in children with different profiles of reading difficulty.

Frontiers in human neuroscience

Hua-Chen Wang, Eva Marinus, Lyndsey Nickels, Anne Castles

PMID: 25071504 PMCID: PMC4081833 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00468

Abstract

Previous studies have found that children with reading difficulties need more exposures to acquire the representations needed to support fluent reading than typically developing readers (e.g., Ehri and Saltmarsh, 1995). Building on existing orthographic learning paradigms, we report on an investigation of orthographic learning in poor readers using a new learning task tracking both the accuracy (untimed exposure duration) and fluency (200 ms exposure duration) of learning novel words over trials. In study 1, we used the paradigm to examine orthographic learning in children with specific poor reader profiles (nine with a surface profile, nine a phonological profile) and nine age-matched controls. Both profiles showed improvement over the learning cycles, but the children with surface profile showed impaired orthographic learning in spelling and orthographic choice tasks. Study 2 explored predictors of orthographic learning in a group of 91 poor readers using the same outcome measures as in Study 1. Consistent with earlier findings in typically developing readers, phonological decoding skill predicted orthographic learning. Moreover, orthographic knowledge significantly predicted orthographic learning over and beyond phonological decoding. The two studies provide insights into how poor readers learn novel words, and how their learning process may be compromised by less proficient orthographic and/or phonological skills.

Keywords: developmental dyslexia; orthographic knowledge; orthographic learning; phonological decoding; subtypes

References

1. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2010 May;1(3):426-432 - PubMed
2. Cognition. 1995 May;55(2):151-218; discussion 219-26 - PubMed
3. Neuropsychologia. 1975 Jan;13(1):75-82 - PubMed
4. Dyslexia. 2005 Nov;11(4):253-68 - PubMed
5. J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jan-Feb;48(1):39-50 - PubMed
6. Mem Cognit. 1982 Jan;10(1):43-53 - PubMed
7. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;108(2):402-10 - PubMed
8. Cortex. 1970 Dec;6(4):417-29 - PubMed
9. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(5):856-64 - PubMed
10. Br J Psychol. 2010 May;101(Pt 2):221-42 - PubMed
11. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Sep;95(1):56-77 - PubMed
12. Cognition. 2013 Jan;126(1):20-38 - PubMed
13. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jul;103(3):296-308 - PubMed
14. Psychol Methods. 2001 Dec;6(4):402-12 - PubMed
15. J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Mar;96(3):169-96 - PubMed
16. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(2):338-46 - PubMed
17. J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Feb;87(2):125-54 - PubMed
18. J Exp Child Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):77-96 - PubMed
19. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):204-56 - PubMed
20. Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):996-1011 - PubMed
21. J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 May;109(1):39-57 - PubMed
22. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2013;30(1):1-24 - PubMed
23. J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;72(2):95-129 - PubMed
24. J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Feb;72(2):73-94 - PubMed
25. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1495-517 - PubMed
26. J Educ Psychol. 1983 Feb;75(1):3-18 - PubMed
27. Cognition. 1996 Feb;58(2):157-95 - PubMed
28. Cognition. 1993 May;47(2):149-80 - PubMed
29. J Exp Child Psychol. 2002 Jul;82(3):185-99 - PubMed
30. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 May;115(1):137-49 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article