Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 18;5:676. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00676. eCollection 2014.

Social implications arise in embodied music cognition research which can counter musicological "individualism".

Frontiers in psychology

Nikki Moran

Affiliations

  1. Reid School of Music, Edinburgh College of Art, Edinburgh University Edinburgh, UK.

PMID: 25101011 PMCID: PMC4102907 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00676

Abstract

The agenda in music research that is broadly recognized as embodied music cognition has arrived hand-in-hand with a social interpretation of music, focusing on the real-world basis of its performance, and fostering an empirical approach to musician movement regarding the communicative function and potential of those movements. However, embodied cognition emerged from traditional cognitivism, which produced a body of scientific explanation of music-theoretic concepts. The analytical object of this corpus is based on the particular imagined encounter of a listener responding to an idealized "work." Although this problem of essentialism has been identified within mainstream musicology, the lingering effects may spill over into interdisciplinary, empirical research. This paper defines the situation according to its legacy of individualism, and offers an alternative sketch of musical activity as performance event, a model that highlights the social interaction processes at the heart of musical behavior. I describe some recent empirical work based on interaction-oriented approaches, arguing that this particular focus - on the social interaction process itself - creates a distinctive and promising agenda for further research into embodied music cognition.

Keywords: empirical research; individualism; music cognition; music performance; social interaction

References

  1. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Mar;55:98-104 - PubMed
  2. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Mar;102(3):299-314 - PubMed
  3. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Feb 28;6:26 - PubMed
  4. BMC Neurosci. 2009 Mar 17;10:22 - PubMed
  5. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1565-77 - PubMed
  6. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Nov;64(11):2153-67 - PubMed
  7. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1060:462-6 - PubMed
  8. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:115-38 - PubMed
  9. Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):639-51 - PubMed
  10. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2220-30 - PubMed
  11. Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):653-67 - PubMed
  12. Cognition. 1983 Jan;13(1):63-102 - PubMed
  13. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:617-45 - PubMed
  14. Science. 2005 Jun 3;308(5727):1430 - PubMed
  15. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Feb;76(2):527-40 - PubMed
  16. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):969-92 - PubMed
  17. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Nov;23(11):2592-600 - PubMed
  18. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36 - PubMed
  19. Cognition. 2011 Feb;118(2):157-70 - PubMed
  20. Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Oct;31(5):559-75; discussion 575-621 - PubMed
  21. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):403-52 - PubMed
  22. Psychol Rev. 1982 Jul;89(4):305-33 - PubMed
  23. Exp Psychol. 2013;60(1):53-63 - PubMed
  24. Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 13;4:841 - PubMed

Publication Types