Display options
Share it on

Front Genet. 2014 Jul 21;5:225. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00225. eCollection 2014.

A simulation study of gene-by-environment interactions in GWAS implies ample hidden effects.

Frontiers in genetics

Urko M Marigorta, Greg Gibson

Affiliations

  1. Center for Integrative Genomics, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA, USA.

PMID: 25101110 PMCID: PMC4104702 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00225

Abstract

The switch to a modern lifestyle in recent decades has coincided with a rapid increase in prevalence of obesity and other diseases. These shifts in prevalence could be explained by the release of genetic susceptibility for disease in the form of gene-by-environment (GxE) interactions. Yet, the detection of interaction effects requires large sample sizes, little replication has been reported, and a few studies have demonstrated environmental effects only after summing the risk of GWAS alleles into genetic risk scores (GRSxE). We performed extensive simulations of a quantitative trait controlled by 2500 causal variants to inspect the feasibility to detect gene-by-environment interactions in the context of GWAS. The simulated individuals were assigned either to an ancestral or a modern setting that alters the phenotype by increasing the effect size by 1.05-2-fold at a varying fraction of perturbed SNPs (from 1 to 20%). We report two main results. First, for a wide range of realistic scenarios, highly significant GRSxE is detected despite the absence of individual genotype GxE evidence at the contributing loci. Second, an increase in phenotypic variance after environmental perturbation reduces the power to discover susceptibility variants by GWAS in mixed cohorts with individuals from both ancestral and modern environments. We conclude that a pervasive presence of gene-by-environment effects can remain hidden even though it contributes to the genetic architecture of complex traits.

Keywords: GWAS; complex disease; decanalization; environmental perturbation; gene-by-environment; genetic risk score; modern lifestyle; obesity

References

  1. Genetics. 2004 Dec;168(4):2271-84 - PubMed
  2. Gastroenterology. 2007 May;132(6):2087-102 - PubMed
  3. Nat Genet. 2010 Nov;42(11):937-48 - PubMed
  4. Nat Genet. 2008 May;40(5):616-22 - PubMed
  5. BMJ. 2014 Mar 19;348:g1610 - PubMed
  6. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Jan 15;177(2):103-15 - PubMed
  7. PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001116 - PubMed
  8. Curr Nutr Rep. 2012 Jun 26;1:184-196 - PubMed
  9. Nat Genet. 2010 Jul;42(7):570-5 - PubMed
  10. Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Jan 13;90(1):7-24 - PubMed
  11. Diabetes. 2008 Jan;57(1):95-101 - PubMed
  12. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 11;367(15):1387-96 - PubMed
  13. Transl Psychiatry. 2013 Aug 13;3:e290 - PubMed
  14. Nat Genet. 2012 Mar 25;44(5):483-9 - PubMed
  15. JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2173-4 - PubMed
  16. PLoS Med. 2011 Oct;8(10):e1001106 - PubMed
  17. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20816 - PubMed
  18. Physiol Res. 2011;60(1):175-83 - PubMed
  19. Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;30(5):1035-40 - PubMed
  20. Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;32(1):51-7 - PubMed
  21. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40503 - PubMed
  22. Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Feb;10(2):134-40 - PubMed
  23. Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1413-21 - PubMed
  24. Nature. 2010 Oct 14;467(7317):832-8 - PubMed
  25. Lancet. 2007 Dec 8;370(9603):1929-38 - PubMed
  26. Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Sep;5(9):681-90 - PubMed
  27. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009 May;89(5):1453-8 - PubMed
  28. PLoS One. 2010 May 20;5(5):e10746 - PubMed
  29. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27135 - PubMed
  30. Transl Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 28;1:e14 - PubMed
  31. Mol Neurobiol. 2011 Oct;44(2):160-5 - PubMed
  32. Hum Genet. 2013 May;132(5):495-508 - PubMed
  33. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011 Sep;19(9):1866-72 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support