Display options
Share it on

Genes Nutr. 2014 Nov;9(6):433. doi: 10.1007/s12263-014-0433-3. Epub 2014 Oct 11.

Genetic variation in the hTAS2R38 taste receptor and food consumption among Finnish adults.

Genes & nutrition

Mari Sandell, Ulla Hoppu, Vera Mikkilä, Nina Mononen, Mika Kähönen, Satu Männistö, Tapani Rönnemaa, Jorma Viikari, Terho Lehtimäki, Olli T Raitakari

Affiliations

  1. Functional Foods Forum, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland, [email protected].

PMID: 25303850 PMCID: PMC4235829 DOI: 10.1007/s12263-014-0433-3

Abstract

Genetic variation in bitter taste receptors, such as hTAS2R38, may affect food preferences and intake. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between bitter taste receptor haplotypes and the consumption of vegetables, fruits, berries and sweet foods among an adult Finnish population. A cross-sectional design utilizing data from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns cohort from 2007, which consisted of 1,903 men and women who were 30-45 years of age from five different regions in Finland, was employed. DNA was extracted from blood samples, and hTAS2R38 polymorphisms were determined based on three SNPs (rs713598, rs1726866 and rs10246939). Food consumption was assessed with a validated food frequency questionnaire. The prevalence of the bitter taste-sensitive (PAV/PAV) haplotype was 11.3 % and that of the insensitive (AVI/AVI) haplotype was 39.5 % among this Finnish population. PAV homozygotic women consumed fewer vegetables than did the AVI homozygotic women, 269 g/day (SD 131) versus 301 g/day (SD 187), respectively, p = 0.03 (multivariate ANOVA). Furthermore, the intake of sweet foods was higher among the PAV homozygotes of both genders. Fruit and berry consumption did not differ significantly between the haplotypes in either gender. Individuals perceive foods differently, and this may influence their patterns of food consumption. This study showed that the hTAS2R38 taste receptor gene variation was associated with vegetable and sweet food consumption among adults in a Finnish population.

References

  1. Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e216-22 - PubMed
  2. Hum Mutat. 2005 Sep;26(3):199-204 - PubMed
  3. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1293-300 - PubMed
  4. Physiol Behav. 2007 Jun 8;91(2-3):264-73 - PubMed
  5. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Oct;16(10):2289-95 - PubMed
  6. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Jan;28 Suppl 1:45-51 - PubMed
  7. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Dec;98(6):1583-91 - PubMed
  8. Clin Genet. 2005 Apr;67(4):275-80 - PubMed
  9. Science. 2003 Feb 21;299(5610):1221-5 - PubMed
  10. Annu Rev Nutr. 2008;28:367-88 - PubMed
  11. Food Funct. 2013 Apr 25;4(4):592-601 - PubMed
  12. BMC Genet. 2010 Jul 01;11:60 - PubMed
  13. Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Sep 1;166(5):576-81 - PubMed
  14. Curr Biol. 2005 Feb 22;15(4):322-7 - PubMed
  15. Appetite. 2002 Jun;38(3):201-9 - PubMed
  16. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Aug;66(2):391-7 - PubMed
  17. Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6B):1179-96 - PubMed
  18. Curr Biol. 2006 Sep 19;16(18):R792-4 - PubMed
  19. BMJ. 2012 Jan 15;346:e7492 - PubMed
  20. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Sep;106(9):1371-9 - PubMed
  21. Public Health Nutr. 1999 Dec;2(4):513-9 - PubMed
  22. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Jun;100(6):647-55 - PubMed
  23. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):994-1001 - PubMed
  24. Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6B):1329-45 - PubMed
  25. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 May;17(5):937-8; author reply 939 - PubMed
  26. Appetite. 2013 Feb;61(1):85-96 - PubMed
  27. Br J Nutr. 2007 Jul;98(1):218-25 - PubMed
  28. Physiol Behav. 2000 Mar;68(5):691-7 - PubMed
  29. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Nov;12(11):2174-82 - PubMed
  30. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2011 Jul;71(4):274-9 - PubMed
  31. Chemosens Percept. 2010 Dec 1;3(3-4):137-148 - PubMed
  32. Physiol Behav. 2006 Feb 28;87(2):304-13 - PubMed
  33. Eur J Nutr. 2012 Sep;51(6):637-63 - PubMed
  34. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;37(6):1220-6 - PubMed
  35. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;49(4):401-9 - PubMed

Publication Types