Display options
Cite
Chiaia-Hernandez AC, Schymanski EL, Kumar P, et al. Suspect and nontarget screening approaches to identify organic contaminant records in lake sediments. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(28):7323-35doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-8166-0.
Chiaia-Hernandez, A. C., Schymanski, E. L., Kumar, P., Singer, H. P., & Hollender, J. (2014). Suspect and nontarget screening approaches to identify organic contaminant records in lake sediments. Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 406(28), 7323-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8166-0
Chiaia-Hernandez, Aurea C, et al. "Suspect and nontarget screening approaches to identify organic contaminant records in lake sediments." Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry vol. 406,28 (2014): 7323-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8166-0
Chiaia-Hernandez AC, Schymanski EL, Kumar P, Singer HP, Hollender J. Suspect and nontarget screening approaches to identify organic contaminant records in lake sediments. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Nov;406(28):7323-35. doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-8166-0. Epub 2014 Sep 26. PMID: 25258286.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Nov;406(28):7323-35. doi: 10.1007/s00216-014-8166-0. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

Suspect and nontarget screening approaches to identify organic contaminant records in lake sediments.

Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry

Aurea C Chiaia-Hernandez, Emma L Schymanski, Praveen Kumar, Heinz P Singer, Juliane Hollender

Affiliations

  1. Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600, Dübendorf, Switzerland.

PMID: 25258286 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8166-0

Abstract

Sediment cores provide a valuable record of historical contamination, but so far, new analytical techniques such as high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have not yet been applied to extend target screening to the detection of unknown contaminants for this complex matrix. Here, a combination of target, suspect, and nontarget screening using liquid chromatography (LC)-HRMS/MS was performed on extracts from sediment cores obtained from Lake Greifensee and Lake Lugano located in the north and south of Switzerland, respectively. A suspect list was compiled from consumption data and refined using the expected method coverage and a combination of automated and manual filters on the resulting measured data. Nontarget identification efforts were focused on masses with Cl and Br isotope information available that exhibited mass defects outside the sample matrix, to reduce the effect of analytical interferences. In silico methods combining the software MOLGEN-MS/MS and MetFrag were used for direct elucidation, with additional consideration of retention time/partitioning information and the number of references for a given substance. The combination of all available information resulted in the successful identification of three suspect (chlorophene, flufenamic acid, lufenuron) and two nontarget compounds (hexachlorophene, flucofuron), confirmed with reference standards, as well as the tentative identification of two chlorophene congeners (dichlorophene, bromochlorophene) that exhibited similar time trends through the sediment cores. This study demonstrates that complementary application of target, suspect, and nontarget screening can deliver valuable information despite the matrix complexity and provide records of historical contamination in two Swiss lakes with previously unreported compounds.

Publication Types