Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 23;5:1052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01052. eCollection 2014.

Predictive uncertainty in auditory sequence processing.

Frontiers in psychology

Niels Chr Hansen, Marcus T Pearce

Affiliations

  1. Music in the Brain, Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus, Denmark ; Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg Aarhus, Denmark ; Department of Aesthetics and Communication, Aarhus University Aarhus, Denmark.
  2. Cognitive Science Research Group, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London London, UK.

PMID: 25295018 PMCID: PMC4171990 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01052

Abstract

Previous studies of auditory expectation have focused on the expectedness perceived by listeners retrospectively in response to events. In contrast, this research examines predictive uncertainty-a property of listeners' prospective state of expectation prior to the onset of an event. We examine the information-theoretic concept of Shannon entropy as a model of predictive uncertainty in music cognition. This is motivated by the Statistical Learning Hypothesis, which proposes that schematic expectations reflect probabilistic relationships between sensory events learned implicitly through exposure. Using probability estimates from an unsupervised, variable-order Markov model, 12 melodic contexts high in entropy and 12 melodic contexts low in entropy were selected from two musical repertoires differing in structural complexity (simple and complex). Musicians and non-musicians listened to the stimuli and provided explicit judgments of perceived uncertainty (explicit uncertainty). We also examined an indirect measure of uncertainty computed as the entropy of expectedness distributions obtained using a classical probe-tone paradigm where listeners rated the perceived expectedness of the final note in a melodic sequence (inferred uncertainty). Finally, we simulate listeners' perception of expectedness and uncertainty using computational models of auditory expectation. A detailed model comparison indicates which model parameters maximize fit to the data and how they compare to existing models in the literature. The results show that listeners experience greater uncertainty in high-entropy musical contexts than low-entropy contexts. This effect is particularly apparent for inferred uncertainty and is stronger in musicians than non-musicians. Consistent with the Statistical Learning Hypothesis, the results suggest that increased domain-relevant training is associated with an increasingly accurate cognitive model of probabilistic structure in music.

Keywords: auditory cognition; entropy; expectation; information theory; melody; music; statistical learning

References

  1. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 25;6(2):e17337 - PubMed
  2. Cognition. 2005 Sep;97(2):B25-34 - PubMed
  3. Neurosci Lett. 2001 Jul 27;308(1):33-6 - PubMed
  4. Cognition. 2007 Dec;105(3):669-80 - PubMed
  5. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 May;28(3):458-67 - PubMed
  6. Dev Sci. 2005 Jan;8(1):1-7 - PubMed
  7. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1483-93 - PubMed
  8. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 May;10(5):233-8 - PubMed
  9. Cognition. 2002 Mar;83(2):B35-42 - PubMed
  10. Perception. 2010;39(10):1365-89 - PubMed
  11. Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):625-52 - PubMed
  12. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Apr;1252:139-46 - PubMed
  13. J Phon. 2011 Jul 1;39(3):388-402 - PubMed
  14. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):280-9 - PubMed
  15. Psychol Rev. 1982 Jul;89(4):334-68 - PubMed
  16. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Nov;5(4):579-94 - PubMed
  17. Cognition. 2006 May;100(1):100-30 - PubMed
  18. Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(9):1749-62 - PubMed
  19. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24(1):9-15 - PubMed
  20. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Mar 22;4:25 - PubMed
  21. Psychol Rev. 2000 Oct;107(4):885-913 - PubMed
  22. J Sports Sci. 2002 Jun;20(6):471-85 - PubMed
  23. Percept Psychophys. 2002 May;64(4):640-9 - PubMed
  24. J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 8;30(49):16601-8 - PubMed
  25. Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):304-20 - PubMed
  26. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):1119-30 - PubMed
  27. Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul 8;30(4):643-72 - PubMed
  28. Neuroimage. 2010 Mar;50(1):302-13 - PubMed
  29. Curr Biol. 2001 Sep 18;11(18):R729-32 - PubMed
  30. Psychol Res. 1995;57(2):103-18 - PubMed
  31. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Dec;130(4):658-80 - PubMed
  32. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38 - PubMed
  33. Cognition. 1996 Jan;58(1):75-125 - PubMed
  34. Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):159-92 - PubMed
  35. Dev Psychol. 2001 Jan;37(1):74-85 - PubMed
  36. Cognition. 2000 Jul 14;76(1):13-58 - PubMed
  37. Psychol Sci. 2006 Oct;17(10):905-12 - PubMed
  38. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1060:100-10 - PubMed
  39. Cognition. 1999 Feb 1;70(1):27-52 - PubMed
  40. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 29;360(1456):815-36 - PubMed
  41. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Sep;30(5):1131-42 - PubMed
  42. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Jan;31(1):24-39 - PubMed
  43. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):293-301 - PubMed
  44. Dev Neuropsychol. 2000;18(2):237-72 - PubMed
  45. Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;33(5):951-68 - PubMed
  46. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 03;8:20 - PubMed
  47. Neuroreport. 1999 Apr 26;10(6):1309-13 - PubMed
  48. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jul-Aug;16(6):1010-21 - PubMed
  49. Percept Psychophys. 1995 May;57(4):451-62 - PubMed
  50. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):1117-21 - PubMed
  51. Cortex. 2009 Jan;45(1):80-92 - PubMed
  52. Science. 1996 Dec 13;274(5294):1926-8 - PubMed
  53. Cognition. 2001 Aug;81(1):B11-20 - PubMed
  54. J Neurosci. 2009 Jan 14;29(2):454-9 - PubMed
  55. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Nov;12(4):403-10 - PubMed
  56. Music Percept. 2010 Jun 1;27(5):377-388 - PubMed
  57. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2544-90 - PubMed
  58. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):67-73 - PubMed
  59. Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):233-8 - PubMed
  60. Cogn Psychol. 2006 Aug;53(1):59-96 - PubMed
  61. Perception. 2003;32(3):341-65 - PubMed
  62. Perception. 2003;32(6):741-66 - PubMed
  63. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Nov;58(8):1347-75 - PubMed
  64. Neuroimage. 2005 Jan 15;24(2):560-4 - PubMed
  65. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:397-401 - PubMed

Publication Types