Display options
Share it on

Calif J Health Promot. 2012 Jul;10(1):44-55.

Male Veterans Coping With the Pendulum Swing of Rheumatiod Arthritis Pain: A Qualitative Study.

Californian journal of health promotion

Cleopatra Beaton, Felicia Hodge, Adeline Nyamathi, Ari Weinreb, Vickie Mays, Sally Maliski

Affiliations

  1. Veterans Administration.
  2. University of California, Los Angeles.

PMID: 25530733 PMCID: PMC4270000

Abstract

This study describes the physical, psychological and social context of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pain from the male veterans. A qualitative, descriptive design was employed using a purposive sampling to ensure representation of male veterans. Interviews were conducted with 12 male veterans of the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System. Socio-demographic characteristics, clinical profiles and descriptors of rheumatoid pain experienced by male veterans' since their diagnoses were gathered. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Grounded Theory analysis techniques were used to identify concepts related to living with RA Pain. Six concepts related to RA pain adaptation emerged. Three concepts were associated with movement (keep moving, consequences of not moving, staying physically active) and three were related to emotion (thinking positive thoughts, doing jobs, focusing on male identity). The "keep moving" concept explained coping with chronic RA pain through three activity types: physical, cognitive and socio-economic activities. These activities fluctuated in intensity depending upon the disease stage and RA symptoms. The forward and backward pendulum swing described the unpredictable course and pain coping strategy of the veterans. Further studies are recommended to determine the transferability of our findings to other populations and to confirm the impact of continuous motion as an effective pain management strategy for RA.

Keywords: male perspectives; pain management; rheumatoid arthritis; veteran

References

  1. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;47(4):391-7 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Nurs. 2004 Feb;13(2):259-67 - PubMed
  3. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr 15;49(2):200-8 - PubMed
  4. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Mar 15;59(3):416-21 - PubMed
  5. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Sep;57(9):533-9 - PubMed
  6. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S109-13 - PubMed
  7. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;70(3):640-55 - PubMed
  8. J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):214-22 - PubMed
  9. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Feb;58(2):376-83 - PubMed
  10. Am J Occup Ther. 2004 Jul-Aug;58(4):398-407 - PubMed
  11. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1999 Feb;25(1):215-32, viii - PubMed
  12. Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Apr;13(2):89-99 - PubMed
  13. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct;54(10 ):3087-94 - PubMed
  14. Arthritis Care Res. 1992 Dec;5(4):196-201 - PubMed
  15. Physiol Behav. 2008 May 23;94(2):270-5 - PubMed
  16. Clin J Pain. 2005 May-Jun;21(3):223-31 - PubMed
  17. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Apr 15;101(8):1201-5 - PubMed
  18. Chronic Illn. 2006 Jun;2(2):109-20 - PubMed
  19. Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Jul;58(1):55-62 - PubMed
  20. Arthritis Care Res. 1996 Oct;9(5):368-75 - PubMed
  21. Health Care Women Int. 1994 Sep-Oct;15(5):377-83 - PubMed
  22. J Rheumatol. 1999 May;26(5):1052-7 - PubMed
  23. Musculoskeletal Care. 2006 Jun;4(2):101-15 - PubMed
  24. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Apr;60(4):413-5 - PubMed
  25. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Dec 15;51(6):1045-59 - PubMed
  26. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec 15;53(6):939-49 - PubMed
  27. Appl Nurs Res. 1996 Nov;9(4):177-83 - PubMed
  28. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(4):339-44 - PubMed
  29. Gend Med. 2005 Sep;2(3):137-45 - PubMed
  30. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jan;44(1):105-10 - PubMed
  31. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Mar;46(3):625-31 - PubMed
  32. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Feb;54(2):621-7 - PubMed
  33. Musculoskeletal Care. 2011 Jun;9(2):102-12 - PubMed
  34. Pain. 1999 Dec;83(3):601-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support