Display options
Share it on

Iperception. 2014 May 06;5(2):101-19. doi: 10.1068/i0635. eCollection 2014.

Drawing skill is related to the efficiency of encoding object structure.

i-Perception

Florian Perdreau, Patrick Cavanagh

Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 8242, Paris, France; e-mail: [email protected].
  2. Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 8242, Paris, France; e-mail: [email protected].

PMID: 25469216 PMCID: PMC4249990 DOI: 10.1068/i0635

Abstract

Accurate drawing calls on many skills beyond simple motor coordination. A good internal representation of the target object's structure is necessary to capture its proportion and shape in the drawing. Here, we assess two aspects of the perception of object structure and relate them to participants' drawing accuracy. First, we assessed drawing accuracy by computing the geometrical dissimilarity of their drawing to the target object. We then used two tasks to evaluate the efficiency of encoding object structure. First, to examine the rate of temporal encoding, we varied presentation duration of a possible versus impossible test object in the fovea using two different test sizes (8° and 28°). More skilled participants were faster at encoding an object's structure, but this difference was not affected by image size. A control experiment showed that participants skilled in drawing did not have a general advantage that might have explained their faster processing for object structure. Second, to measure the critical image size for accurate classification in the periphery, we varied image size with possible versus impossible object tests centered at two different eccentricities (3° and 8°). More skilled participants were able to categorise object structure at smaller sizes, and this advantage did not change with eccentricity. A control experiment showed that the result could not be attributed to differences in visual acuity, leaving attentional resolution as a possible explanation. Overall, we conclude that drawing accuracy is related to faster encoding of object structure and better access to crowded details.

Keywords: artists; drawing accuracy; expertise; impossible objects; object perception; object structure

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Feb;4(1):47-60 - PubMed
  2. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(7):1448-66 - PubMed
  3. Science. 1988 Jun 17;240(4859):1627-31 - PubMed
  4. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1990 Mar;119(1):5-24 - PubMed
  5. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 - PubMed
  6. J Vis. 2011 Apr 20;11(4):null - PubMed
  7. Mem Cognit. 2009 Mar;37(2):235-47 - PubMed
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):847-57 - PubMed
  9. Perception. 2007;36(8):1152-67 - PubMed
  10. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):88-94 - PubMed
  11. Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2 - PubMed
  12. Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):791-800 - PubMed
  13. J Vis. 2012 Jun 19;12(6):null - PubMed
  14. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006 May;25(3):296-324 - PubMed
  15. Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 1;64:685-92 - PubMed
  16. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;15(4):160-8 - PubMed
  17. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;92(1):10-9 - PubMed
  18. Cortex. 2009 Mar;45(3):368-76 - PubMed
  19. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Dec 30;5:171 - PubMed
  20. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011 Sep;41(9):1192-201 - PubMed
  21. Vision Res. 2013 Dec 18;93:10-8 - PubMed
  22. Nature. 1996 Sep 26;383(6598):334-7 - PubMed
  23. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):609-21 - PubMed
  24. Vision Res. 2005 May;45(11):1459-69 - PubMed
  25. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 - PubMed
  26. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136 - PubMed
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13130-5 - PubMed
  28. Vision Res. 1992 Jul;32(7):1349-57 - PubMed
  29. Nature. 1997 Apr 10;386(6625):601-4 - PubMed
  30. Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Jun;1(3):115-21 - PubMed
  31. Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):997-1009 - PubMed
  32. Front Neurosci. 2013 Jan 31;7:6 - PubMed
  33. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Jan;17(1):3-19 - PubMed
  34. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):996-1003 - PubMed
  35. Percept Psychophys. 1999 May;61(4):675-90 - PubMed
  36. Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8 - PubMed
  37. Vision Res. 2009 Mar;49(8):810-8 - PubMed
  38. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):613-7 - PubMed
  39. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):516-24 - PubMed
  40. Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):137-76 - PubMed
  41. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1344-61 - PubMed
  42. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Sep;3(3):344-51 - PubMed
  43. J Vis. 2005 Feb 04;5(1):58-70 - PubMed
  44. Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):791-804 - PubMed
  45. Psychol Bull. 1998 Nov;124(3):372-422 - PubMed
  46. Cogn Psychol. 1996 Aug;31(1):1-40 - PubMed
  47. Iperception. 2013 Aug 07;4(6):380-95 - PubMed

Publication Types