Display options
Share it on

Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27(4):362-368.

Normal values and reproducibility of the real-time index of vagal tone in healthy humans: a multi-center study.

Annals of gastroenterology

Adam D Farmer, Steven J Coen, Michiko Kano, Nathalie Weltens, Huynh Giao Ly, Claude Botha, Peter A Paine, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Qasim Aziz

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Digestive Diseases, Blizard Institute, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK (Adam D. Farmer, Steven J. Coen, Michiko Kano, Claude Botha, Qasim Aziz).
  2. Centre for Digestive Diseases, Blizard Institute, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK (Adam D. Farmer, Steven J. Coen, Michiko Kano, Claude Botha, Qasim Aziz) ; Behavioural Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan (Michiko Kano).
  3. Translational Research Centre for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Belgium (Nathalie Weltens, Huynh Giao Ly, Lukas Van Oudenhove).
  4. Salford Royal Foundation NHS Trust, UK (Peter A. Paine) ; Gastrointestinal Sciences, University of Manchester, UK (Peter A. Paine).

PMID: 25330916 PMCID: PMC4188934

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The parasympathetic nervous system has been implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of gastrointestinal disorders including irritable bowel syndrome. Within the field, cardiometric parameters of parasympathetic/vagal tone are most commonly derived from time, or frequency, domain analysis of heart rate variability (HRV), yet it has limited temporal resolution. Cardiac vagal tone (CVT) is a non-invasive beat-to-beat measure of brainstem efferent vagal activity that overcomes many of the temporal limitations of HRV parameters. However, its normal values and reproducibility in healthy subjects are not fully described. The aim of this study was to address these knowledge gaps.

METHODS: 200 healthy subjects (106 males, median age 28 years, range 18-59 years) were evaluated across three study centers. After attachment of CVT recording equipment, 20 min of data (resting/no stimulation) was acquired. 30 subjects, selected at random, were restudied after 1 year.

RESULTS: The mean CVT was 9.5±4.16 linear vagal scale (LVS). Thus, the normal range (mean±2 standard deviations) for CVT based on this data was 1.9-17.8 LVS. CVT correlated negatively with heart rate (r=-0.6, P=0.001). CVT reproducibility over 1 year, as indexed by an intra-class correlational coefficient of 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.91), was good.

CONCLUSIONS: In healthy subjects, the normal range for CVT should be considered to be 1.9-17.8 LVS and is reproducible over 1 year. Future research utilizing CVT should refer to these values although further study is warranted in patient groups.

Keywords: Autonomic nervous system; cardiac vagal tone; parasympathetic nervous system

References

  1. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Jul;24(7):e285-93 - PubMed
  2. Gastroenterology. 2004 Dec;127(6):1695-703 - PubMed
  3. J Physiol. 1978 Sep;282:365-74 - PubMed
  4. Biol Res Nurs. 2006 Apr;7(4):256-67 - PubMed
  5. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Feb;35(3):319-26 - PubMed
  6. Circulation. 1993 Jul;88(1):127-35 - PubMed
  7. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1993 Jul;28(7):638-42 - PubMed
  8. Am J Physiol. 1970 Apr;218(4):1030-7 - PubMed
  9. Neurosci Lett. 2005 Sep 2;385(1):64-9 - PubMed
  10. Nurs Res. 2002 Jan-Feb;51(1):59-62 - PubMed
  11. Neurol Sci. 2003 May;24 Suppl 2:S68-70 - PubMed
  12. Neuroscience. 1998 Nov;87(1):135-46 - PubMed
  13. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 May;109(5):392-9 - PubMed
  14. Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Mar 1;49(5):410-5 - PubMed
  15. Muscle Nerve. 1991 Dec;14(12):1165-72 - PubMed
  16. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):233-6 - PubMed
  17. Pain. 2009 Feb;141(3):191-209 - PubMed
  18. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Feb 1;59(4):256-62 - PubMed
  19. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65 - PubMed
  20. Psychosom Med. 2010 Oct;72(8):802-9 - PubMed
  21. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008 Apr;20(4):336-42 - PubMed
  22. J Physiol. 1976 Jul;258(3):769-82 - PubMed
  23. Circ J. 2004 Apr;68(4):343-7 - PubMed
  24. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2266-2276 - PubMed
  25. Biol Psychol. 2009 Oct;82(2):101-10 - PubMed
  26. Rev Port Cardiol. 2012 Feb;31(2):135-41 - PubMed
  27. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jun;64(6):589-97 - PubMed
  28. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013 Jul;8(4):400-9 - PubMed
  29. Am J Physiol. 1999 Feb;276(2):H758-65 - PubMed
  30. Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):938-48 - PubMed
  31. Biol Psychol. 2007 Feb;74(2):286-94 - PubMed
  32. J Hepatol. 1997 Jun;26(6):1242-8 - PubMed
  33. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Jan;55(1):31-5 - PubMed
  34. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Jan;26(1):139-48 - PubMed
  35. Pain. 2009 Aug;144(3):236-244 - PubMed
  36. Pain. 2009 Aug;144(3):223-224 - PubMed
  37. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):655-66 - PubMed
  38. Gut. 2007 Mar;56(3):358-64 - PubMed
  39. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Mar;24(3):206-16 - PubMed
  40. J Auton Pharmacol. 1992 Apr;12(2):109-15 - PubMed
  41. Blood Press Monit. 2002 Jun;7(3):179-83 - PubMed
  42. Physiol Meas. 2001 Nov;22(4):661-72 - PubMed

Publication Types