Display options
Share it on

J Res Pharm Pract. 2014 Oct;3(4):123-9. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.145387.

Evaluation of Magnesium as an adjuvant in Ropivacaine-induced supraclavicular brachial plexus block: A prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled study.

Journal of research in pharmacy practice

Kasturi Mukherjee, Anjan Das, Sandip Roy Basunia, Soumyadip Dutta, Parthajit Mandal, Anindya Mukherjee

Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  3. Department of Orthopedics, R.G Kar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  4. Department of G and O, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
  5. Department of Anaesthesiology, N.R.S Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

PMID: 25535620 PMCID: PMC4262858 DOI: 10.4103/2279-042X.145387

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Different additives have been used to prolong brachial plexus block. We evaluated the effect of adding magnesium sulfate to ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade. The primary endpoints were the onset and duration of sensory and motor block and duration of analgesia.

METHODS: One hundred patients (25-55 years) posted for elective forearm and hand surgeries under supraclavicular brachial plexus block were divided into two equal groups (Groups RM and RN) in a randomized, double-blind fashion. In group RM (n = 50), 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 150 mg (in 1 ml 0.9% saline) magnesium sulfate and in group RN (n = 50), 30 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 1 ml normal saline were administered in supraclavicular block. Sensory and motor block onset times and block durations, time to first analgesic use, total analgesic need, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), hemodynamic variables, and side effects were recorded for each patient.

FINDINGS: Though with similar demographic profile and block (sensory and motor) onset time, the sensory and motor block duration and time to first analgesic use were significantly longer and the total need for rescue analgesics was lower in group RM (P = 0.026) than group RN. Postoperative VAS values at 24 h were significantly lower in group RM (P = 0.045). Intraoperative hemodynamics was comparable among two groups and no appreciable side effect was noted throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION: It can be concluded from this study that adding magnesium sulfate to supraclavicular brachial plexus block may increase the sensory and motor block duration and time to first analgesic use, and decrease total analgesic needs, with no side effects.

Keywords: Magnesium sulfate; Ropivacaine; supraclavicular brachial plexus block

References

  1. Pain. 1994 Jul;58(1):129-32 - PubMed
  2. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):21-7 - PubMed
  3. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jan;20(1):38-47 - PubMed
  4. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;8(1):78-82 - PubMed
  5. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):233-6 - PubMed
  6. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(10):607-9 - PubMed
  7. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Jun;79(6):667-78 - PubMed
  8. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992 Jul 7;217(2-3):137-41 - PubMed
  9. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Jan-Feb;25(1):41-6 - PubMed
  10. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2010 Apr;19(2):161-6 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Mar;25(2):92-7 - PubMed
  12. Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:7 - PubMed
  13. Anesth Analg. 1993 Aug;77(2):362-79 - PubMed
  14. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012 Mar;50(1):19-24 - PubMed
  15. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013 Jan;7(1):37-9 - PubMed
  16. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 May;21(5):1119-24 - PubMed
  17. Anesth Analg. 2001 May;92(5):1173-81 - PubMed
  18. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Jul;6(3):273-8 - PubMed
  19. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jul;87(1):206-10 - PubMed
  20. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Jul;6(3):254-8 - PubMed
  21. Anesth Analg. 1995 Sep;81(3):534-8 - PubMed
  22. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1997;16(1):9-13 - PubMed
  23. Medicina (Kaunas). 2002;38(7):695-8 - PubMed
  24. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;29(4):491-5 - PubMed
  25. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Jul;65(1):4-8 - PubMed
  26. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Oct;89(4):594-8 - PubMed
  27. Korean J Pain. 2011 Sep;24(3):158-63 - PubMed
  28. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Oct;52(8):822-6 - PubMed
  29. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Mar;58(3):260-6 - PubMed
  30. Pain. 1991 Mar;44(3):293-9 - PubMed
  31. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):215-8 - PubMed
  32. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2008 Jul-Sep;6(23):302-9 - PubMed

Publication Types