Display options
Cite
Valente A, Bürki A, Laganaro M. ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: a trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:390doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00390.
Valente, A., Bürki, A., & Laganaro, M. (2014). ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: a trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response. Frontiers in neuroscience, 8390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00390
Valente, Andrea, et al. "ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: a trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response." Frontiers in neuroscience vol. 8 (2014): 390. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00390
Valente A, Bürki A, Laganaro M. ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: a trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response. Front Neurosci. 2014 Dec 04;8:390. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00390. eCollection 2014. PMID: 25538546; PMCID: PMC4255522.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Neurosci. 2014 Dec 04;8:390. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00390. eCollection 2014.

ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: a trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response.

Frontiers in neuroscience

Andrea Valente, Audrey Bürki, Marina Laganaro

Affiliations

  1. Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Éducation, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland.

PMID: 25538546 PMCID: PMC4255522 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00390

Abstract

A major effort in cognitive neuroscience of language is to define the temporal and spatial characteristics of the core cognitive processes involved in word production. One approach consists in studying the effects of linguistic and pre-linguistic variables in picture naming tasks. So far, studies have analyzed event-related potentials (ERPs) during word production by examining one or two variables with factorial designs. Here we extended this approach by investigating simultaneously the effects of multiple theoretical relevant predictors in a picture naming task. High density EEG was recorded on 31 participants during overt naming of 100 pictures. ERPs were extracted on a trial by trial basis from picture onset to 100 ms before the onset of articulation. Mixed-effects regression models were conducted to examine which variables affected production latencies and the duration of periods of stable electrophysiological patterns (topographic maps). Results revealed an effect of a pre-linguistic variable, visual complexity, on an early period of stable electric field at scalp, from 140 to 180 ms after picture presentation, a result consistent with the proposal that this time period is associated with visual object recognition processes. Three other variables, word Age of Acquisition, Name Agreement, and Image Agreement influenced response latencies and modulated ERPs from ~380 ms to the end of the analyzed period. These results demonstrate that a topographic analysis fitted into the single trial ERPs and covering the entire processing period allows one to associate the cost generated by psycholinguistic variables to the duration of specific stable electrophysiological processes and to pinpoint the precise time-course of multiple word production predictors at once.

Keywords: ERP; encoding processes; picture naming; single trial; topographies

References

  1. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Apr;20(4):912-28 - PubMed
  2. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):481-7 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):514-29 - PubMed
  4. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:813870 - PubMed
  5. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Nov;32(4):588-615 - PubMed
  6. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Jun;76(3):130-41 - PubMed
  7. Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):61-105 - PubMed
  8. Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Feb;22(1):1-38; discussion 38-75 - PubMed
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15;14(6):951-64 - PubMed
  10. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Feb;36(1):140-55 - PubMed
  11. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215 - PubMed
  12. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):111-35 - PubMed
  13. Nature. 1996 Jun 6;381(6582):520-2 - PubMed
  14. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jan;15(2):137-53 - PubMed
  15. Cortex. 2005 Feb;41(1):7-25 - PubMed
  16. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Nov;31(4):650-8 - PubMed
  17. Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 01;5:586 - PubMed
  18. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Apr;19(4):617-31 - PubMed
  19. Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):163-74 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 15;106(50):21442-6 - PubMed
  21. Brain Lang. 2004 Jun;89(3):617-22 - PubMed
  22. Cognition. 1998 May;66(2):B25-33 - PubMed
  23. Brain Topogr. 2008 Jun;20(4):249-64 - PubMed
  24. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):971-9 - PubMed
  25. Brain Topogr. 2011 Mar;24(1):19-29 - PubMed
  26. Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):113-39 - PubMed
  27. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):640-54 - PubMed
  28. Science. 1998 Apr 24;280(5363):572-4 - PubMed
  29. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 - PubMed
  30. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Aug;31(3):531-52 - PubMed
  31. Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 01;2:208 - PubMed
  32. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):null - PubMed
  33. Cognition. 2001 Nov;82(1):B1-14 - PubMed
  34. Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Dec;3(4):395-421 - PubMed
  35. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1567-86 - PubMed
  36. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):441-54 - PubMed
  37. Neuroscience. 2009 Sep 29;163(1):252-65 - PubMed
  38. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995 Jul;42(7):658-65 - PubMed
  39. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Jun;25(4):463-92 - PubMed
  40. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;25(2):256-86 - PubMed
  41. Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):478-90 - PubMed
  42. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):735-47 - PubMed
  43. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2003 Feb;35(1):158-67 - PubMed
  44. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Sep;10(5):553-67 - PubMed
  45. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):892-905 - PubMed
  46. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1998 Mar;24(2):515-23 - PubMed
  47. Cognition. 2005 Jun;96(2):B45-54 - PubMed
  48. Mem Cognit. 2005 Jul;33(5):905-12 - PubMed
  49. Neuroimage. 2006 May 1;30(4):1383-400 - PubMed
  50. Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):101-44 - PubMed
  51. Brain Topogr. 2010 Jun;23(2):119-27 - PubMed
  52. Br J Psychol. 2002 Feb;93(Pt 1):89-114 - PubMed
  53. Brain Lang. 2014 Aug;135:20-31 - PubMed
  54. Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 02;2:356 - PubMed
  55. Brain Topogr. 2010 Sep;23(3):233-42 - PubMed
  56. PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3781 - PubMed
  57. Front Psychol. 2011 Oct 12;2:255 - PubMed
  58. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):516-24 - PubMed
  59. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Nov;30(11):3596-608 - PubMed
  60. Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 15;59(4):3881-8 - PubMed
  61. Psychol Rev. 1986 Jul;93(3):283-321 - PubMed
  62. Neuroimage. 2006 Nov 1;33(2):732-8 - PubMed
  63. Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):705-14 - PubMed
  64. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Apr;53(4):221-7 - PubMed
  65. Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):84-99 - PubMed
  66. Psychophysiology. 2000 Jul;37(4):473-84 - PubMed
  67. Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):816-47 - PubMed
  68. Int J Psychophysiol. 1998 Jun;29(1):1-11 - PubMed
  69. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1499-510 - PubMed
  70. Mem Cognit. 2003 Jun;31(4):491-504 - PubMed
  71. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(7):778-87 - PubMed
  72. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Oct;59(10):1681-90 - PubMed
  73. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Dec;4(4):466-82 - PubMed

Publication Types