Display options
Cite
Duijns S, van Gils JA, Spaans B, et al. Sex-specific winter distribution in a sexually dimorphic shorebird is explained by resource partitioning. Ecol Evol. 2014;4(20):4009-18doi: 10.1002/ece3.1213.
Duijns, S., van Gils, J. A., Spaans, B., Ten Horn, J., Brugge, M., & Piersma, T. (2014). Sex-specific winter distribution in a sexually dimorphic shorebird is explained by resource partitioning. Ecology and evolution, 4(20), 4009-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1213
Duijns, Sjoerd, et al. "Sex-specific winter distribution in a sexually dimorphic shorebird is explained by resource partitioning." Ecology and evolution vol. 4,20 (2014): 4009-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1213
Duijns S, van Gils JA, Spaans B, Ten Horn J, Brugge M, Piersma T. Sex-specific winter distribution in a sexually dimorphic shorebird is explained by resource partitioning. Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;4(20):4009-18. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1213. Epub 2014 Oct 02. PMID: 25505527; PMCID: PMC4242582.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;4(20):4009-18. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1213. Epub 2014 Oct 02.

Sex-specific winter distribution in a sexually dimorphic shorebird is explained by resource partitioning.

Ecology and evolution

Sjoerd Duijns, Jan A van Gils, Bernard Spaans, Job Ten Horn, Maarten Brugge, Theunis Piersma

Affiliations

  1. Department of Marine Ecology, NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB, Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands.
  2. Department of Marine Ecology, NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research P.O. Box 59, 1790 AB, Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands ; Animal Ecology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands.

PMID: 25505527 PMCID: PMC4242582 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1213

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) implies correlated differences in energetic requirements and feeding opportunities, such that sexes will face different trade-offs in habitat selection. In seasonal migrants, this could result in a differential spatial distribution across the wintering range. To identify the ecological causes of sexual spatial segregation, we studied a sexually dimorphic shorebird, the bar-tailed godwit Limosa lapponica, in which females have a larger body and a longer bill than males. With respect to the trade-offs that these migratory shorebirds experience in their choice of wintering area, northern and colder wintering sites have the benefit of being closer to the Arctic breeding grounds. According to Bergmann's rule, the larger females should incur lower energetic costs per unit of body mass over males, helping them to winter in the cold. However, as the sexes have rather different bill lengths, differences in sex-specific wintering sites could also be due to the vertical distribution of their buried prey, that is, resource partitioning. Here, in a comparison between six main intertidal wintering areas across the entire winter range of the lapponica subspecies in northwest Europe, we show that the percentage of females between sites was not correlated with the cost of wintering, but was positively correlated with the biomass in the bottom layer and negatively with the biomass in the top layer. We conclude that resource partitioning, rather than relative expenditure advantages, best explains the differential spatial distribution of male and female bar-tailed godwits across northwest Europe.

Keywords: Bergmann's rule; Limosa lapponica; habitat selection; intertidal ecology; prey accessibility; sexual size dimorphism (SSD)

References

  1. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Nov;75(4):503-18 - PubMed
  2. PLoS Biol. 2006 Nov;4(12):e376 - PubMed
  3. Biol Lett. 2006 Mar 22;2(1):43-6 - PubMed
  4. Ecology. 2007 Mar;88(3):781-91 - PubMed
  5. Science. 1974 Jul 5;185(4145):27-39 - PubMed
  6. Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):945-55 - PubMed
  7. J Anim Ecol. 2009 Nov;78(6):1259-68 - PubMed
  8. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Sep 22;278(1719):2728-36 - PubMed
  9. Ecology. 2011 Jan;92(1):3-10 - PubMed
  10. Integr Comp Biol. 2007 Aug;47(2):245-57 - PubMed
  11. Ecology. 2013 Jan;94(1):11-7 - PubMed
  12. Ecol Evol. 2013 Apr;3(4):1079-90 - PubMed
  13. Oecologia. 1991 Sep;87(4):581-587 - PubMed
  14. J Morphol. 1996 Apr;228(1):45-60 - PubMed

Publication Types