Display options
Cite
Allen RB, Hurst JM, Portier J, et al. Elevation-dependent responses of tree mast seeding to climate change over 45 years. Ecol Evol. 2014;4(18):3525-37doi: 10.1002/ece3.1210.
Allen, R. B., Hurst, J. M., Portier, J., & Richardson, S. J. (2014). Elevation-dependent responses of tree mast seeding to climate change over 45 years. Ecology and evolution, 4(18), 3525-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1210
Allen, Robert B, et al. "Elevation-dependent responses of tree mast seeding to climate change over 45 years." Ecology and evolution vol. 4,18 (2014): 3525-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1210
Allen RB, Hurst JM, Portier J, Richardson SJ. Elevation-dependent responses of tree mast seeding to climate change over 45 years. Ecol Evol. 2014 Sep;4(18):3525-37. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1210. Epub 2014 Aug 28. PMID: 25478145; PMCID: PMC4224528.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Ecol Evol. 2014 Sep;4(18):3525-37. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1210. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Elevation-dependent responses of tree mast seeding to climate change over 45 years.

Ecology and evolution

Robert B Allen, Jennifer M Hurst, Jeanne Portier, Sarah J Richardson

Affiliations

  1. Landcare Research PO Box 40, Lincoln, 7640, New Zealand.
  2. Centre d'Etude de la Forêt, Université du Québec à Montréal C.P. 8888, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada.

PMID: 25478145 PMCID: PMC4224528 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1210

Abstract

We use seed count data from a New Zealand mono-specific mountain beech forest to test for decadal trends in seed production along an elevation gradient in relation to changes in climate. Seedfall was collected (1965 to 2009) from seed trays located on transect lines at fixed elevations along an elevation gradient (1020 to 1370 m). We counted the number of seeds in the catch of each tray, for each year, and determined the number of viable seeds. Climate variables were obtained from a nearby (<2 km) climate station (914-m elevation). Variables were the sum or mean of daily measurements, using periods within each year known to correlate with subsequent interannual variation in seed production. To determine trends in mean seed production, at each elevation, and climate variables, we used generalized least squares (GLS) regression. We demonstrate a trend of increasing total and viable seed production, particularly at higher elevations, which emerged from marked interannual variation. Significant changes in four seasonal climate variables had GLS regression coefficients consistent with predictions of increased seed production. These variables subsumed the effect of year in GLS regressions with a greater influence on seed production with increasing elevation. Regression models enforce a view that the sequence of climate variables was additive in their influence on seed production throughout a reproductive cycle spanning more than 2 years and including three summers. Models with the most support always included summer precipitation as the earliest variable in the sequence followed by summer maximum daily temperatures. We interpret this as reflecting precipitation driven increases in soil nutrient availability enhancing seed production at higher elevations rather than the direct effects of climate, stand development or rising atmospheric CO2 partial pressures. Greater sensitivity of tree seeding at higher elevations to changes in climate reveals how ecosystem responses to climate change will be spatially variable.

Keywords: Beech; New Zealand; Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides; environmental gradient; intraspecific; long-term data; resources; seed production; time series

References

  1. Science. 2013 Feb 8;339(6120):659-60 - PubMed
  2. Ecol Appl. 2007 Dec;17(8):2145-51 - PubMed
  3. Am Nat. 2001 May;157(5):537-54 - PubMed
  4. Ecol Lett. 2013 Jan;16(1):90-8 - PubMed
  5. Science. 1998 Feb 13;279(5353):1023-6 - PubMed
  6. New Phytol. 2007;175(1):11-28 - PubMed
  7. Oecologia. 2013 Mar;171(3):653-62 - PubMed
  8. Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):909-16 - PubMed
  9. Tree Physiol. 2010 Sep;30(9):1083-95 - PubMed
  10. Tree Physiol. 2008 Aug;28(8):1269-76 - PubMed
  11. Am Nat. 2000 Jan;155(1):59-69 - PubMed
  12. New Phytol. 2010 Jul;187(2):485-93 - PubMed
  13. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Nov;19(11):3529-39 - PubMed
  14. Ecology. 2012 Mar;93(3):462-9 - PubMed
  15. Ecol Appl. 2008 Oct;18(7):1664-78 - PubMed
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 5;109 (23 ):9000-5 - PubMed
  17. Am Nat. 1998 Oct;152(4):576-94 - PubMed
  18. New Phytol. 2006;172(3):393-411 - PubMed
  19. Oecologia. 2014 Mar;174(3):679-87 - PubMed
  20. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Sep;11(9):378-82 - PubMed
  21. New Phytol. 2014 Mar;201(4):1096-100 - PubMed
  22. Int J Biometeorol. 2002 May;46(2):66-75 - PubMed
  23. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 13;5(10):e13212 - PubMed
  24. Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Dec;9(12):465-70 - PubMed
  25. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Nov;19(11):3463-71 - PubMed
  26. Oecologia. 2014 Mar;174(3):665-77 - PubMed
  27. Ecol Lett. 2009 Nov;12(11):1119-26 - PubMed
  28. New Phytol. 2012 Oct;196(1):189-99 - PubMed

Publication Types