Display options
Share it on

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2014 May 13;1(1):e000028. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000028. eCollection 2014.

An observational cohort study to determine efficacy, adherence and outcome of the early initiation of pressure support ventilation during mechanical ventilation.

BMJ open respiratory research

Guy Glover, Bronwen Connolly, Stefania Di Gangi, Lisa Ayers, Marius Terblanche, Richard Beale, Nicholas Hart

Affiliations

  1. Department of Critical Care , Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
  2. Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology , King's College London , London , UK ; Lane Fox Respiratory Unit , Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK ; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre , London , UK.
  3. Department of Critical Care , Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK ; Division of Health & Social Care Research, King's College London , London , UK.

PMID: 25478179 PMCID: PMC4212705 DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000028

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely initiation of weaning from mechanical ventilation (MV) is important. Non-validated screening criteria may delay weaning if too prescriptive. This study observed physician-led utilisation of pressure support ventilation (PSV), referenced to four reported conventional screening criteria hypothesising that these criteria would have delayed the weaning progress.

METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study of adult patients receiving MV in a 30-bed university hospital intensive care unit (ICU). Logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with PSV failure. Outcome is reported according to adherence to the screening criteria.

RESULTS: 209 patients were included (age 62.6±15.9 years, male:female 115:94, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II 16.7±6.1). Median (IQR) time to initiate PSV was 11.0 (5.0-22.0) h, and duration of weaning to extubation was 43.0 (13.0-121.5) h. PSV weaning was initiated despite significant hypoxia (partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2:FiO2) 35.8±15.9 kPa), moderate positive end-expiratory pressure levels (7.5±2.5 cm H2O), deep sedation (44% Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale (RASS) ≤-3) and cardiovascular instability (48.8%). At PSV initiation, 85% of patients violated at least one screening criterion, yet 74.6% of patients remained stable for 24 h and 25.4% of patients were successfully extubated within 12 h. There was no association between individual screening criteria and PSV failure. Failure to sustain a PSV trial was associated with ventilation >7 days (RR=2.12 (1.33 to 3.38), p=0.002) and ICU mortality (RR=2.94 (1.46 to 5.94), p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS: Physician-led transition to PSV and weaning was often initiated early and successfully before patients fulfilled conventional screening criteria. Failure to sustain a PSV trial could be an early indicator of prolonged MV and ICU mortality and warrants further investigation. These data support the view that current screening criteria may delay initiation of weaning.

Keywords: Assisted Ventilation; Respiratory Measurement

References

  1. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Aug;34(8):1477-86 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):126-34 - PubMed
  3. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar 15;169(6):673-8 - PubMed
  4. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R54 - PubMed
  5. Eur Respir J. 2007 May;29(5):1033-56 - PubMed
  6. JAMA. 2010 Apr 21;303(15):1483-9 - PubMed
  7. Anesthesiology. 2002 Apr;96(4):788-94 - PubMed
  8. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Feb;12(1):13-8 - PubMed
  9. BMJ. 2011 Jan 13;342:c7237 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 16;363(12):1107-16 - PubMed
  11. N Engl J Med. 1995 Feb 9;332(6):345-50 - PubMed
  12. Respir Care. 2010 Jun;55(6):784-6 - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 2002 Jan 16;287(3):345-55 - PubMed
  14. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1595-9 - PubMed
  15. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1;183(3):364-71 - PubMed
  16. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Oct;34(10):1788-95 - PubMed
  17. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 19;335(25):1864-9 - PubMed
  18. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug 15;184(4):430-7 - PubMed
  19. Crit Care Med. 2000 May;28(5):1269-75 - PubMed
  20. Crit Care Med. 1997 Apr;25(4):567-74 - PubMed
  21. Chest. 1990 Jun;97(6):1412-9 - PubMed
  22. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):459-65 - PubMed
  23. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Aug 15;184(4):392-4 - PubMed
  24. Crit Care Med. 2003 Nov;31(11):2604-10 - PubMed
  25. Chest. 2005 Feb;127(2):598-603 - PubMed
  26. JAMA. 2013 May 22;309(20):2121-9 - PubMed
  27. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44 - PubMed
  28. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 - PubMed
  29. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Oct;150(4):896-903 - PubMed
  30. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2499-505 - PubMed
  31. Crit Care Med. 2005 Dec;33(12):2804-9 - PubMed
  32. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Oct 15;174(8):894-900 - PubMed

Publication Types