Display options
Cite
Perez IB, Brown PJ. The role of ROS signaling in cross-tolerance: from model to crop. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:754doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00754.
Perez, I. B., & Brown, P. J. (2014). The role of ROS signaling in cross-tolerance: from model to crop. Frontiers in plant science, 5754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00754
Perez, Ilse Barrios, and Brown, Patrick J. "The role of ROS signaling in cross-tolerance: from model to crop." Frontiers in plant science vol. 5 (2014): 754. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00754
Perez IB, Brown PJ. The role of ROS signaling in cross-tolerance: from model to crop. Front Plant Sci. 2014 Dec 23;5:754. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00754. eCollection 2014. PMID: 25566313; PMCID: PMC4274871.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Front Plant Sci. 2014 Dec 23;5:754. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00754. eCollection 2014.

The role of ROS signaling in cross-tolerance: from model to crop.

Frontiers in plant science

Ilse Barrios Perez, Patrick J Brown

Affiliations

  1. Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana, IL, USA.

PMID: 25566313 PMCID: PMC4274871 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00754

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are key signaling molecules produced in response to biotic and abiotic stresses that trigger a variety of plant defense responses. Cross-tolerance, the enhanced ability of a plant to tolerate multiple stresses, has been suggested to result partly from overlap between ROS signaling mechanisms. Cross-tolerance can manifest itself both as a positive genetic correlation between tolerance to different stresses (inherent cross-tolerance), and as the priming of systemic plant tolerance through previous exposure to another type of stress (induced cross-tolerance). Research in model organisms suggests that cross-tolerance could be used to benefit the agronomy and breeding of crop plants. However, research under field conditions has been scarce and critical issues including the timing, duration, and intensity of a stressor, as well as its interactions with other biotic and abiotic factors, remain to be addressed. Potential applications include the use of chemical stressors to screen for stress-resistant genotypes in breeding programs and the agronomic use of chemical inducers of plant defense for plant protection. Success of these applications will rely on improving our understanding of how ROS signals travel systemically and persist over time, and of how genetic correlations between resistance to ROS, biotic, and abiotic stresses are shaped by cooperative and antagonistic interactions within the underlying signaling pathways.

Keywords: GST; acclimation; oxidative stress; oxylipin; quantitative disease resistance; systemic resistance

References

  1. Plant J. 1999 Mar;17(6):603-14 - PubMed
  2. Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Jul;49(5):515-32 - PubMed
  3. Plant Physiol. 2002 Sep;130(1):120-7 - PubMed
  4. Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Sep;7(9):405-10 - PubMed
  5. J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Jul 16;51(15):4308-14 - PubMed
  6. J Biol Chem. 2004 Mar 19;279(12):11736-43 - PubMed
  7. Plant Cell. 2004 Feb;16(2):319-31 - PubMed
  8. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1996;34:347-66 - PubMed
  9. Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2734-46 - PubMed
  10. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:373-99 - PubMed
  11. Genetics. 2005 Apr;169(4):2277-93 - PubMed
  12. J Exp Bot. 2005 Jun;56(416):1525-33 - PubMed
  13. Plant Physiol. 2005 Oct;139(2):847-56 - PubMed
  14. Plant Physiol. 2005 Dec;139(4):1784-94 - PubMed
  15. Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Jan;11(1):15-9 - PubMed
  16. J Plant Physiol. 2007 Mar;164(3):283-94 - PubMed
  17. Plant Physiol. 2006 Jun;141(2):436-45 - PubMed
  18. Ann Bot. 2006 Aug;98(2):279-88 - PubMed
  19. Plant Physiol. 2006 Jun;141(2):312-22 - PubMed
  20. J Virol Methods. 2007 Jan;139(1):71-7 - PubMed
  21. FEBS Lett. 2006 Dec 11;580(28-29):6537-42 - PubMed
  22. J Biol Chem. 2007 Mar 23;282(12):9260-8 - PubMed
  23. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2007 Jan;45(1):70-9 - PubMed
  24. Plant Cell. 2007 Mar;19(3):1065-80 - PubMed
  25. Phytopathology. 2008 Nov;98(11):1226-32 - PubMed
  26. Phytopathology. 1999 Jul;89(7):598-602 - PubMed
  27. Trends Plant Sci. 2009 Jan;14(1):21-9 - PubMed
  28. Plant Physiol. 2009 Aug;150(4):1648-55 - PubMed
  29. New Phytol. 2010 Jan;185(1):285-99 - PubMed
  30. PLoS One. 2010 Jan 08;5(1):e8632 - PubMed
  31. Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Jun;33(6):914-25 - PubMed
  32. Plant Physiol. 2010 May;153(1):3-13 - PubMed
  33. Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Mar;34(3):406-17 - PubMed
  34. Nat Genet. 2011 Feb;43(2):163-8 - PubMed
  35. Trends Plant Sci. 2011 Jun;16(6):300-9 - PubMed
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 3;108(18):7339-44 - PubMed
  37. Plant Cell Environ. 2012 Feb;35(2):234-44 - PubMed
  38. Environ Toxicol. 2013 Dec;28(12):666-72 - PubMed
  39. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40899 - PubMed
  40. Plant Mol Biol. 2013 Oct;83(3):265-77 - PubMed
  41. J Exp Bot. 2013 Aug;64(11):3467-81 - PubMed
  42. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 10;8(10):e77261 - PubMed
  43. J Exp Bot. 2014 Mar;65(5):1229-40 - PubMed
  44. J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Dec 26;61(51):12473-91 - PubMed
  45. Planta. 2014 Mar;239(3):679-94 - PubMed
  46. Front Plant Sci. 2013 Dec 18;4:510 - PubMed
  47. Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Feb;38(2):240-52 - PubMed
  48. PLoS Genet. 2014 Feb 13;10(2):e1004112 - PubMed
  49. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e91721 - PubMed
  50. Plant Physiol. 2014 May 16;165(3):1367-1379 - PubMed
  51. Bot Stud. 2014 Dec;55(1):9 - PubMed

Publication Types