Display options
Share it on

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Dec;87(6):311-8. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.6.311. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

Effect of triclosan-coated sutures on surgical site infection after gastric cancer surgery via midline laparotomy.

Annals of surgical treatment and research

Kuk Hyun Jung, Seung Jong Oh, Kang Kook Choi, Su Mi Kim, Min Gew Choi, Jun Ho Lee, Jae Hyung Noh, Tae Sung Sohn, Jae Moon Bae, Sung Kim

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  2. Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

PMID: 25485239 PMCID: PMC4255552 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.6.311

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical site infection (SSI) after open abdominal surgery is still a frequently reported nosocomial infection. To reduce the incidence of SSI, triclosan-coated sutures with antiseptic activity (Vicryl Plus) were developed. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of Vicryl Plus on SSI after gastric cancer surgery via midline laparotomy.

METHODS: A total of 916 patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery at Samsung Medical Center between December 2009 and September 2011 were prospectively collected. We examined the occurrence of SSI (primary endpoint), assessments of wound healing (secondary endpoint). They were evaluated postoperatively on days 3, 7, and 30.

RESULTS: Of the 916 patients, 122 were excluded postoperatively by screening (out of the study protocol, adverse events, etc.). The remaining 794 patients were enrolled and monitored postoperatively. The cumulative SSI incidence was 11 cases (1.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-2.50) on day 30. Seromas were most frequently detected in wound healing assessments, with a cumulative incidence of 147 cases (18.51%; 95% CI, 15.98-21.39) on day 30.

CONCLUSION: The use of triclosan-coated sutures (Vicryl Plus) for abdominal wall closure can reduce the number of SSIs in gastric cancer surgery.

Keywords: Laparotomy; Stomach neoplasms; Surgical wound infection; Sutures

References

  1. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Mar 1;36(5):592-8 - PubMed
  2. Surgery. 2009 Mar;145(3):330-4 - PubMed
  3. Ann Surg. 1981 Jul;194(1):35-41 - PubMed
  4. Am J Surg. 2001 Feb;181(2):128-32 - PubMed
  5. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;396(6):845-50 - PubMed
  6. Am J Surg. 2011 Aug;202(2):133-8 - PubMed
  7. Coll Antropol. 2011 Jun;35(2):439-43 - PubMed
  8. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):481-9 - PubMed
  9. Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96 - PubMed
  10. Am J Infect Control. 2004 Dec;32(8):470-85 - PubMed
  11. Arch Surg. 2005 Feb;140(2):174-82 - PubMed
  12. J Infect. 2007 Jan;54(1):82-8 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Surg. 1996 Aug;162(8):605-9 - PubMed
  14. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1993 Oct;6(4):428-42 - PubMed
  15. Clin Med Res. 2004 May;2(2):115-8 - PubMed
  16. JAMA. 2003 Oct 8;290(14):1868-74 - PubMed
  17. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Jun;92(6):770-5 - PubMed
  18. Biomaterials. 1995 Mar;16(5):355-60 - PubMed
  19. Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 1;41(7):2387-94 - PubMed
  20. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):572-80 - PubMed
  21. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002;3 Suppl 1:S79-87 - PubMed

Publication Types