Display options
Share it on

World J Emerg Med. 2014;5(4):264-9. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.04.004.

Clinical probability and risk analysis of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

World journal of emergency medicine

Gulden Ozeren Yetgin, Sule Akkose Aydin, Ozlem Koksal, Fatma Ozdemir, Dilek Kostak Mert, Gokhan Torun

Affiliations

  1. Goverment Hospital of Afyon, Afyon, Turkey.
  2. Emergency Department, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.

PMID: 25548599 PMCID: PMC4272929 DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.04.004

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most frequent diseases that could be missed in overcrowded emergency departments as in Turkey. Early and accurate diagnosis could decrease the mortality rate and this standard algorithm should be defined. This study is to find the accurate, fast, non-invasive, cost-effective, easy-to-access diagnostic tests, clinical scoring systems and the patients who should be tested for clinical diagnosis of PE in emergency department.

METHODS: One hundred and forty patients admitted to the emergency department with the final diagnosis of PE regarding to anamnesis, physical examination and risk factors, were included in this prospective, cross-sectional study. The patients with a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, acute coronary syndrome or infection and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were excluded from the study. The demographics, risk factors, radiological findings, vital signs, symptoms, physical-laboratory findings, diagnostic tests and clinical scoring systems of patients (Wells and Geneva) were noted. The diagnostic criteria for pulmonary emboli were: filling defect in the pulmonary artery lumen on spiral computed tomographic angiography and perfusion defect on perfusion scintigraphy.

RESULTS: Totally, 90 (64%) of the patients had PE. Age, hypotension, having deep vein thrombosis were the risk factors, and oxygen saturation, shock index, BNP, troponin and fibrinogen levels as for the biochemical parameters were significantly different between the PE (+) and PE (-) groups (P<0.05). The Wells scoring system was more successful than the other scoring systems.

CONCLUSION: Biochemical parameters, clinical findings, and scoring systems, when used altogether, can contribute to the diagnosis of PE.

Keywords: Emergency department; Probability; Pulmonary embolism

References

  1. Am J Med. 2009 Mar;122(3):257-64 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 25;359(26):2804-13 - PubMed
  3. Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1440-56 - PubMed
  4. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Mar;61(3):244-50 - PubMed
  5. Resuscitation. 1992 Jun-Jul;23(3):227-34 - PubMed
  6. Thorax. 2003 Jun;58(6):470-83 - PubMed
  7. Eur Heart J. 2000 Aug;21(16):1301-36 - PubMed
  8. Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4):909-13 - PubMed
  9. Eur Respir J. 2007 Dec;30(6):1111-6 - PubMed
  10. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Aug 11-25;157(15):1665-70 - PubMed
  11. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Jul 1;9(7):800-10 - PubMed
  12. Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):110S-112S - PubMed
  13. JAMA. 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2753-9 - PubMed
  14. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Jan 8;161(1):92-7 - PubMed
  15. Am J Med. 2003 Feb 15;114(3):173-9 - PubMed
  16. Circulation. 2003 Apr 29;107(16):2082-4 - PubMed
  17. Circulation. 1992 Feb;85(2):462-8 - PubMed
  18. Clin Radiol. 2001 Oct;56(10 ):838-42 - PubMed
  19. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Dec 15;129(12 ):997-1005 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 Suppl 1):I22-30 - PubMed
  21. Radiology. 1993 Oct;189(1):133-6 - PubMed
  22. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Mar;159(3):864-71 - PubMed
  23. Lancet. 1999 Apr 24;353(9162):1386-9 - PubMed

Publication Types