Display options
Share it on

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:985141. doi: 10.1155/2014/985141. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

Hemorrhagic complications of paracentesis: a systematic review of the literature.

Gastroenterology research and practice

Kaveh Sharzehi, Vishal Jain, Ammara Naveed, Ian Schreibman

Affiliations

  1. Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
  2. Coastal Gastroenterology Associates, Brick, NJ 08724, USA.
  3. Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, USA.
  4. Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

PMID: 25580114 PMCID: PMC4280650 DOI: 10.1155/2014/985141

Abstract

Introduction. Large volume paracentesis is considered a safe procedure carrying minimal risk of complications and rarely causing morbidity or mortality. The most common complications of the procedure are ascitic fluid leakage, hemorrhage, infection, and perforation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate all hemorrhagic complications and their outcomes and to identify any common variables. Methods. A literature search for all reported hemorrhagic complications following paracentesis was conducted. A total of 61 patients were identified. Data of interest were extracted and analyzed. The primary outcome of the study was 30-day mortality, with secondary endpoints being achievement of hemostasis after intervention and mortality based on type of intervention. Results. 90% of the patients undergoing paracentesis had underlying cirrhosis. Three types of hemorrhagic complications were identified: abdominal wall hematomas (52%), hemoperitoneum (41%), and pseudoaneurysm (7%). Forty percent of the patients underwent either a surgical (35%) or an IR guided intervention (65%). Patients undergoing a surgical intervention had a significantly higher rate of mortality at day 30 compared to those undergoing IR intervention. Conclusion. Abdominal wall hematomas and hemoperitoneum are the most common hemorrhagic complications of paracentesis. Transcatheter coiling and embolization appear to be superior to both open and laparoscopic surgery in treatment of these complications.

References

  1. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):397-417 - PubMed
  2. Hosp Pract (1995). 2010 Jun;38(3):52-5 - PubMed
  3. Abdom Imaging. 2011 Feb;36(1):74-8 - PubMed
  4. Gastroenterology. 1956 Jan;30(1):127-9 - PubMed
  5. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 Jan;7(1):87-90 - PubMed
  6. N Y State J Med. 1962 Jun 15;62:1997-2004 - PubMed
  7. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Nov;146(11):2259-61 - PubMed
  8. N Y State J Med. 1962 Jun 1;62:1822-6 - PubMed
  9. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Oct-Nov;42(5):489-93 - PubMed
  10. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):525-9 - PubMed
  11. Ann Hepatol. 2009 Oct-Dec;8(4):359-63 - PubMed
  12. Rinsho Hoshasen. 1985 Nov;30(12):1435-9 - PubMed
  13. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Sep;87(9):1209-11 - PubMed
  14. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Feb;91(2):366-8 - PubMed
  15. Dig Dis Sci. 2000 Feb;45(2):357-8 - PubMed
  16. Hepatology. 2009 Jun;49(6):2087-107 - PubMed
  17. Hepatology. 2004 Aug;40(2):484-8 - PubMed
  18. Hepatology. 2003 Jul;38(1):258-66 - PubMed
  19. Palliat Med. 2007 Jan;21(1):62 - PubMed
  20. Am J Gastroenterol. 1986 Apr;81(4):275-9 - PubMed
  21. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2006 Sep;17 (6):491-3 - PubMed
  22. Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Dec;37(12):946-51 - PubMed
  23. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008 Mar;19(3):327-32 - PubMed
  24. Treat Serv Bull. 1951 Sep;6(8):383-6 - PubMed
  25. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Mar;94(3):856 - PubMed
  26. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2002 Sep-Oct;21(5):197-8 - PubMed
  27. Br J Radiol. 2008 Mar;81(963):e64-7 - PubMed
  28. Arch Surg. 1996 Jan;131(1):102-3 - PubMed
  29. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;26(4):306-8 - PubMed
  30. J Vasc Surg. 1998 Sep;28(3):566-9 - PubMed
  31. JAMA. 1978 Feb 13;239(7):628-30 - PubMed
  32. Gastroenterology. 1997 Sep;113(3):978-82 - PubMed
  33. Transfusion. 1991 Feb;31(2):164-71 - PubMed
  34. BMJ Case Rep. 2009;2009:null - PubMed
  35. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Aug;7(8):906-9 - PubMed

Publication Types