Display options
Share it on

Asian Spine J. 2014 Dec;8(6):793-8. doi: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.6.793. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

PainVision Apparatus Is Effective for Assessing Low Back Pain.

Asian spine journal

Seiji Ohtori, Hiroshi Kawaguchi, Tsuneo Takebayashi, Sumihisa Orita, Gen Inoue, Kazuyo Yamauchi, Yasuchika Aoki, Junichi Nakamura, Tetsuhiro Ishikawa, Masayuki Miyagi, Hiroto Kamoda, Miyako Suzuki, Gou Kubota, Yoshihiro Sakuma, Yasuhiro Oikawa, Kazuhide Inage, Takeshi Sainoh, Jun Sato, Kazuhisa Takahashi, Shinichi Konno

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chuo-ku, Japan.
  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.

PMID: 25558322 PMCID: PMC4278985 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.6.793

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Case series.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of "PainVision" apparatus for the assessment of low back pain.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: A newly developed device, the PainVision PS-2100 (Nipro, Osaka, Japan), has been used to assess the perception of pain in a quantitative manner. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PainVision for the assessment of low back pain.

METHODS: We assessed 89 patients with low back pain. The numeric rating scale (NRS) score, McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) score and the degree of pain calculated by PainVision were measured twice at 4-week intervals in each patient. An electrode was patched on the forearm surface of the patients and the degree of pain was automatically calculated (degree of pain=100×[current producing pain comparable with low back pain-current at perception threshold/current at perception threshold]). Correlations between NRS and MPQ scores and the degree of pain were determined using Spearman's rank correlation test.

RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between the NRS and MPQ scores at each time point (rs =0.60, p<0.0001). The degree of pain also showed a moderate correlation with NRS and MPQ scores at each time point (rs =0.40, p<0.03). The change in the degree of pain over 4 weeks showed a moderate correlation with changes in the NRS and MPQ scores (rs =0.40, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: PainVision as self-reported questionnaires is a useful tool to assess low back pain.

Keywords: Assessment; Low back pain; PainVision; Tool

References

  1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Apr;68(4):210-3 - PubMed
  2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):141-4 - PubMed
  3. Eur Spine J. 2007 Jul;16(7):971-5 - PubMed
  4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Oct;12 (8):754-9 - PubMed
  5. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):E492-501 - PubMed
  6. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S158-73 - PubMed
  7. Pain. 1987 Aug;30(2):191-7 - PubMed
  8. Masui. 2011 Sep;60(9):1059-63 - PubMed
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 15;27(14):1567-70 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 1;344(5):363-70 - PubMed
  11. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3 - PubMed
  12. Masui. 2009 Nov;58(11):1367-72 - PubMed

Publication Types