J Conserv Dent. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):25-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.148884.
Effect of amalgam corrosion products in non-discolored dentin on the bond strength of replaced composite resin.
Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Marjaneh Ghavamnasiri, Samaneh Eslami, Hamide Ameri, Joseph E Chasteen, Sara Majidinia, Fatemeh Velayaty Moghadam
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
- Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
- Department of Oral Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
PMID: 25657522
PMCID: PMC4313474 DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.148884
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of amalgam corrosion products in non-discolored dentin on the bond strength of replaced composite resin.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one Class I cavities were prepared on extracted premolars and divided into seven groups. Group 1: Light-cured composite; Groups 2, 3, and 4: Amalgam stored in 37°C normal saline for respectively 1, 3, and 6 months and then replaced with composite leaving the cavity walls intact. Groups 5, 6, and 7: Identical to Groups 2, 3, and 4, except the cavity walls were extended 0.5 mm after amalgam removal. Eighteen specimens from each group were selected for shear bond strength testing, while on remaining five samples, elemental microanalysis was conducted. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Freidman (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between Groups 1 and 4 and also between Group 1 and Groups 5, 6, and 7. However, Groups 1, 2, and 3 showed no significant difference regarding bond strength. Bond strengths of Group 4 was significantly less than Groups 2 and 3. However, Groups 5, 6, and 7 showed similar bond strength. There was no difference among all groups in terms of metal elements at any storage times.
Keywords: Bond strength; EDX analysis; corrosion products
References
- Arch Oral Biol. 1998 Apr;43(4):305-11 - PubMed
- Aust Dent J. 1979 Jun;24(3):174-7 - PubMed
- J Am Dent Assoc. 1953 Oct;47(4):415-22 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 1973 Mar-Apr;52(2):309-17 - PubMed
- Oper Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;27(5):528-34 - PubMed
- J Dent. 2009 May;37(5):366-73 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 2007 Mar;86(3):232-6 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 2000 Jun;79(6):1385-91 - PubMed
- Oper Dent. 2000 Jan-Feb;25(1):2-10 - PubMed
- Quintessence Int. 2012 Apr;43(4):325-32 - PubMed
- Arch Oral Biol. 1975 Jan;20(1):87-8 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 1995 Oct;74(10):1679-88 - PubMed
- J Dent Res. 2003 Feb;82(2):136-40 - PubMed
- Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Dec;110(6):460-3 - PubMed
- Acta Odontol Scand. 1975;33(3):149-60 - PubMed
- Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):72-86 - PubMed
- J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003 Jul 15;66(1):324-30 - PubMed
- J Prosthet Dent. 1968 Dec;20(6):531-40 - PubMed
- Dent Mater. 2010 Feb;26(2):e24-37 - PubMed
Publication Types