Urol Ann. 2015 Jan-Mar;7(1):26-30. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.148585.
Increasing antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens: Is fosfomycin the answer?.
Urology annals
Asfia Sultan, Meher Rizvi, Fatima Khan, Hiba Sami, Indu Shukla, Haris M Khan
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
PMID: 25657539
PMCID: PMC4310112 DOI: 10.4103/0974-7796.148585
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious diseases in clinical practice. The choice of antibiotics for the treatment of UTI is limited by the rising rates of antibiotic resistance. There is an urgent need to discover new effective treatment solutions. Fosfomycin may be an interesting alternative to the currently used treatments of UTIs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted over 6 months period (January to June 2013) in Department of Microbiology, JNMCH, AMU, Aligarh. A total of 1840 urine samples were submitted. Culture and sensitivity was done as per standard microbiological procedures. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR), extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), AmpC and metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL) production was detected.
RESULTS: Culture was positive in 504 (27.4%) cases. Gram-negative etiology was identified in 390 (73%) cases. ESBL production was detected in 154 (37.1%) while 82 (21.6%) were Amp C. No, MBL was detected. Among Gram-positive bacteria, 68 (51.5%) were MRSA, while 4 (13.3%) were vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE). HLAR was seen in 53.3% of enterococci. Fosfomycin was effective in 100% of MRSA, VRE, ESBL, HLAR, and overall, susceptibility to fosfomycin in AmpC producers was extremely high (99%). Norfloxacin and cotrimoxazole were not proved effective as only three isolates were sensitive to norfloxacin, while all Gram-negative isolates were resistant to cotrimoxazole. Pseudomonas species showed 65% and 75% susceptibility to colistin and polymixin B, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Fosfomycin has emerged as a promising option, especially in cases involving multi-drug-resistant pathogens in which previous antibiotics have failed to cure the infection.
Keywords: Enterobacteriaceae; fosfomycin; muti-drug resistant; urinary tract infection
References
- Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001 Oct;7(10):543-7 - PubMed
- Indian J Med Res. 2008 Jan;127(1):85-8 - PubMed
- J Chemother. 2010 Oct;22(5):355-7 - PubMed
- Nurs Times. 2006 Sep 5-11;102(36):25-6 - PubMed
- J Lab Physicians. 2011 Jul;3(2):98-103 - PubMed
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000 Mar;44(3):647-50 - PubMed
- J Infect Dis. 2001 Mar 1;183 Suppl 1:S1-4 - PubMed
- Tanzan J Health Res. 2010 Oct;12(4):236-40 - PubMed
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Oct;53(10):4508-10 - PubMed
- J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009 Apr 30;3(3):177-86 - PubMed
- Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001 Feb;7(2):88-91 - PubMed
- Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;14 Suppl 2:S246-51; discussion S253-4 - PubMed
- J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Nov;65(11):2459-63 - PubMed
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Sep;55(9):4295-301 - PubMed
- Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Jun;35(6):1235-8 - PubMed
- Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;27(8):847-54 - PubMed
- Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;10(1):43-50 - PubMed
- J Lab Physicians. 2013 Jul;5(2):90-3 - PubMed
- Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 1;46(7):1069-77 - PubMed
- Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35(1):12-4 - PubMed
Publication Types