Display options
Share it on

Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jan 22;5:785. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00785. eCollection 2014.

Reconstruction of fire regimes through integrated paleoecological proxy data and ecological modeling.

Frontiers in plant science

Virginia Iglesias, Gabriel I Yospin, Cathy Whitlock

Affiliations

  1. Montana Institute on Ecosystems, Montana State University Bozeman, MT, USA.
  2. Montana Institute on Ecosystems, Montana State University Bozeman, MT, USA ; Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University Bozeman, MT, USA.

PMID: 25657652 PMCID: PMC4302794 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00785

Abstract

Fire is a key ecological process affecting vegetation dynamics and land cover. The characteristic frequency, size, and intensity of fire are driven by interactions between top-down climate-driven and bottom-up fuel-related processes. Disentangling climatic from non-climatic drivers of past fire regimes is a grand challenge in Earth systems science, and a topic where both paleoecology and ecological modeling have made substantial contributions. In this manuscript, we (1) review the use of sedimentary charcoal as a fire proxy and the methods used in charcoal-based fire history reconstructions; (2) identify existing techniques for paleoecological modeling; and (3) evaluate opportunities for coupling of paleoecological and ecological modeling approaches to better understand the causes and consequences of past, present, and future fire activity.

Keywords: charcoal; fire; modeling; paleoecology; reconstruction

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):10861-5 - PubMed
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 18;109(51):20966-70 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):E535-43 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 15;109(20):E1215-20 - PubMed
  5. Science. 1998 Jun 19;280(5371):1916-9 - PubMed
  6. Science. 1993 Nov 5;262(5135):885-9 - PubMed
  7. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Mar;20(3):107-8 - PubMed
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 6;110(32):13055-60 - PubMed
  9. Ecology. 2009 Jul;90(7):1788-801 - PubMed
  10. Science. 2011 Oct 14;334(6053):230-2 - PubMed
  11. New Phytol. 2014 Aug;203(3):900-12 - PubMed
  12. Science. 1988 Aug 26;241(4869):1043-52 - PubMed
  13. Ecol Lett. 2011 May;14(5):522-36 - PubMed
  14. Chemosphere. 2002 Dec;49(8):845-63 - PubMed
  15. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 05;9(11):e111328 - PubMed
  16. Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):705-16 - PubMed
  17. Nature. 2011 Nov 02;479(7373):359-64 - PubMed
  18. Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7):1722-32 - PubMed
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 23;111(51):E5545-54 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 24;106(8):2519-24 - PubMed
  21. Science. 2009 Apr 24;324(5926):481-4 - PubMed
  22. Environ Manage. 2012 Apr;49(4):767-75 - PubMed
  23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 9;104(41):16016-21 - PubMed
  24. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5102 - PubMed
  25. Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Oct;9(10):357-8 - PubMed
  26. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Dec;21(12):696-704 - PubMed
  27. J Biogeogr. 2011 Dec;38(12):2223-2236 - PubMed
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 14;107(50):21343-8 - PubMed

Publication Types