Display options
Share it on

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2012 Jan-Apr;2(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/S2212-4268(12)60008-6.

Relationship of maxilla to cranial base in different facial types-a cephalometric evaluation.

Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Tarun Rana, Rohit Khanna, Tripti Tikku, Kiran Sachan

Affiliations

  1. Senior Lecturer, Seema Dental College and Hospital, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand.
  2. Professor, Babu Banarsi Das Dental College of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  3. Professor and Head, Babu Banarsi Das Dental College of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
  4. Reader, Babu Banarsi Das Dental College of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

PMID: 25756029 PMCID: PMC3941819 DOI: 10.1016/S2212-4268(12)60008-6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many conflicting opinions have been put forth in the dental literature concerning the maxilla and its relationship to craniofacial complex. In view of this fact, this cephalometric study was conducted to determine the relationship of maxilla to cranial base in different facial types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample consists of 120 pretreatment lateral cephalogram, which were categorized into three groups, normodivergent, hypodivergent, and hyperdivergent. Each group consists of 20 males and 20 females. Descriptive statistics for 11 variables were calculated.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The result of this study implies that in hyperdivergent subjects' sagittal maxillary base size was smaller and upper posterior facial height (UPFH) was increased in comparison to hypodivergent and normodivergent subjects. Upper posterior facial height has positive correlation with anterior facial height. Posterior maxillary position in relation to cranial base increases with increase in cranial flexural angle in hypodivergent subjects and vice versa in hyperdivergent subjects. Upper posterior facial height decreases with increase in cranial flexural angle in hypodivergent subjects and vice versa in hyperdivergent subjects.

Keywords: Cranial base angle; hyperdivergent; hypodivergent; maxilla; normodivergent

References

  1. Am J Orthod. 1980 Dec;78(6):670-3 - PubMed
  2. Am J Orthod. 1969 Feb;55(2):109-23 - PubMed
  3. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Apr;33(2):198-204 - PubMed
  4. J Oral Surg. 1978 Apr;36(4):269-77 - PubMed
  5. Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):861-9 - PubMed
  6. J Clin Orthod. 1979 Sep;13(9):598-605 - PubMed
  7. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):715-21 - PubMed
  8. Am J Orthod. 1978 May;73(5):499-511 - PubMed
  9. Br J Orthod. 1984 Oct;11(4):209-13 - PubMed
  10. Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo. 1989 Apr-Jun;3(2):324-33 - PubMed
  11. Am J Orthod. 1976 Oct;70(4):398-408 - PubMed

Publication Types