Display options
Share it on

Food Environ Virol. 2015 Mar 19; doi: 10.1007/s12560-015-9190-8. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Removal of Surrogate Bacteriophages and Enteric Viruses from Seeded Environmental Waters Using a Semi-technical Ultrafiltration Unit.

Food and environmental virology

Anne Frohnert, Katja Kreißel, Pia Lipp, Halim Dizer, Beate Hambsch, Regine Szewzyk, Hans-Christoph Selinka

Affiliations

  1. Federal Environment Agency, Section II 1.4 Microbiological Risks, Corrensplatz 1, 14195, Berlin, Germany.

PMID: 25786890 DOI: 10.1007/s12560-015-9190-8

Abstract

Experiments to determine the removal of viruses in different types of water (surface water from two reservoirs for drinking water treatment, treated groundwater and groundwater contaminated with either 5 or 30 % of wastewater) by ultrafiltration were performed with a semi-technical ultrafiltration unit. Concentrations of human adenoviruses (HAdVs), murine norovirus (MNV), and the bacteriophages MS2, ΦX174 and PRD1 were measured in the feed water and the filtrate, and log removal values were calculated. Bacteria added to the feed water were not detected in the filtrates. In contrast, in most cases viruses and bacteriophages were still present in the filtrates: log removal values were in the range of 1.4-6.3 depending on virus sizes and water qualities. Best removals were observed with bacteriophage PRD1 and HAdVs, followed by MNV and phages MS2 and ΦX174. Virus size, however, was not the only criterion for efficient removal. In diluted wastewater as compared to drinking water and uncontaminated environmental waters, virus removal was clearly higher for all viruses, most likely due to higher membrane fouling. For quality assessment purposes of membrane filtration efficiencies with regard to the elimination of human viruses the small bacteriophages MS2 and ΦX174 should be used as conservative viral indicators.

References

  1. Trends Microbiol. 2000 Mar;8(3):91-3 - PubMed
  2. Water Res. 2011 Jan;45(3):1025-38 - PubMed
  3. Water Res. 2012 May 15;46(8):2505-14 - PubMed
  4. Water Res. 2010 Feb;44(4):1114-25 - PubMed
  5. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Dec;72(12):7886-93 - PubMed
  6. Anal Chim Acta. 2011 Apr 1;690(2):190-8 - PubMed
  7. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2009;198:133-67 - PubMed
  8. Food Environ Virol. 2015 Sep;7(3):261-8 - PubMed
  9. Cell. 1999 Sep 17;98(6):825-33 - PubMed
  10. Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(2):255-61 - PubMed
  11. Water Res. 2009 Jun;43(10):2657-68 - PubMed
  12. Water Sci Technol. 2012;66(1):151-7 - PubMed
  13. Water Res. 2010 Mar;44(6):1747-52 - PubMed
  14. Virol J. 2013 Jun 10;10:190 - PubMed
  15. Arch Virol. 2007;152(9):1709-19 - PubMed
  16. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Mar;71(3):1453-61 - PubMed
  17. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(23):13422-9 - PubMed
  18. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Aug;109(2):388-97 - PubMed
  19. Water Res. 2012 May 15;46(8):2651-64 - PubMed
  20. Water Sci Technol. 2012;66(6):1195-202 - PubMed
  21. Water Res. 2014 Sep 15;61:297-307 - PubMed
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Sep;68(9):4523-33 - PubMed

Publication Types