Display options
Cite
Schiller C, Franke T, Belle J, et al. Words of wisdom - patient perspectives to guide recovery for older adults after hip fracture: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:57-64doi: 10.2147/PPA.S75657.
Schiller, C., Franke, T., Belle, J., Sims-Gould, J., Sale, J., & Ashe, M. C. (2015). Words of wisdom - patient perspectives to guide recovery for older adults after hip fracture: a qualitative study. Patient preference and adherence, 957-64. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75657
Schiller, Claire, et al. "Words of wisdom - patient perspectives to guide recovery for older adults after hip fracture: a qualitative study." Patient preference and adherence vol. 9 (2015): 57-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S75657
Schiller C, Franke T, Belle J, Sims-Gould J, Sale J, Ashe MC. Words of wisdom - patient perspectives to guide recovery for older adults after hip fracture: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jan 12;9:57-64. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S75657. eCollection 2015. PMID: 25609927; PMCID: PMC4298293.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jan 12;9:57-64. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S75657. eCollection 2015.

Words of wisdom - patient perspectives to guide recovery for older adults after hip fracture: a qualitative study.

Patient preference and adherence

Claire Schiller, Thea Franke, Jessica Belle, Joanie Sims-Gould, Joanna Sale, Maureen C Ashe

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Robert H N Ho Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada ; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  2. Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Robert H N Ho Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  3. Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  4. Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

PMID: 25609927 PMCID: PMC4298293 DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S75657

Abstract

Recovery after hip fracture is complex involving many transitions along the care continuum. The recovery process, and these transitions, often present significant challenges for older adults and their families and caregivers. There is an identified need for more targeted information to support older adults and their families throughout the recovery process.Therefore, our goal was to understand the recovery phase after hip fracture from the patient perspective, and identify specific messages that could be integrated into future educational material for clinical practice to support patients during recovery. Using a qualitative description design guided by a strengths-based focus, we invited men and women 60+ years with previous hip fracture and their family members/caregivers to participate in interviews. We used purposive criterion sampling within the community setting to recruit participants. We followed a semi-structured guide to conduct the interviews, either in person or over the telephone, and focused questions on experiences with hip fracture and factors that enabled recovery. Two investigators coded and analyzed interview transcripts to identify key messages. We interviewed a total of 19 participants: eleven older adults who sustained a hip fracture and eight family member/caregivers. Participants described three main messages that enabled recovery: 1) seek support; 2) move more; and 3) preserve perspective. Participants provided vital information about their recovery experience from hip fracture. In future, this knowledge can be incorporated into patient-centered education and shared with older adults, their families, and health care professionals across the continuum of care.

Keywords: education; hip fractures; patient-centered care; qualitative research

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 1997 Sep;26(3):623-30 - PubMed
  2. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Mar;55(3):407-13 - PubMed
  3. Int J Integr Care. 2013 Jun 26;13:e023 - PubMed
  4. Osteoporos Int. 2012 Sep;23(9):2239-56 - PubMed
  5. J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804 - PubMed
  6. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Sep;55(9):M498-507 - PubMed
  7. JAMA. 1996 Jan 10;275(2):152-6 - PubMed
  8. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Nov;20(11):1019-25 - PubMed
  9. JAMA. 2014 Feb 19;311(7):700-8 - PubMed
  10. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2234-41 - PubMed
  11. J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jan;45(2):126-33; discussion 134-5 - PubMed
  12. Health Place. 1998 Dec;4(4):327-39 - PubMed
  13. Rehabil Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;34(3):110-7 - PubMed
  14. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Feb;24(2):659-69 - PubMed
  15. J Interprof Care. 2012 May;26(3):205-11 - PubMed
  16. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD005955 - PubMed
  17. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2010 Jun;12(3):186-91 - PubMed
  18. Int J Integr Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;12:e13 - PubMed
  19. Int J Integr Care. 2013 Oct 31;13:e044 - PubMed
  20. HSS J. 2007 Feb;3(1):63-70 - PubMed
  21. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Mar;68(3):364.e1-10 - PubMed
  22. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;36(1):39-46 - PubMed
  23. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Oct;68(10):735-40 - PubMed
  24. Soc Work. 1996 May;41(3):296-305 - PubMed
  25. Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40 - PubMed
  26. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84 - PubMed
  27. Phys Ther. 2006 Nov;86(11):1520-33 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support