Display options
Share it on

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:309797. doi: 10.1155/2014/309797. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Tailored Partially Covered Stents (Placed Fluoroscopically) versus Standard Uncovered Stents (Placed Endoscopically).

Gastroenterology research and practice

Ding Shi, Feng Ji, Yin-Su Bao, Yong-Pan Liu

Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Yuhang District, No. 369 Yingbing Road, Hangzhou 311100, China.
  2. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
  3. Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450000, China.

PMID: 25610459 PMCID: PMC4290140 DOI: 10.1155/2014/309797

Abstract

The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy and safety of "outlet-shape" tailored stents with standard stents for the management of distal gastric cancer causing gastric outlet obstructions (GOOs) with varying gastric cavity shapes and sizes. To determine the shape and size of the GOOs, stomach opacifications were performed using contrast media before stenting. Two basic shapes of the residual cavity of the proximal GOO were observed: cup shaped or approximately cup shaped and funnel shaped or approximately funnel shaped. Other shapes were not found. In the GOO tailored group, the size and shape of the proximal ends of the tailored stent were suited for the residual cavity of the proximal GOO. The tailored stents included large cup-shaped stents and large funnel-shaped stents. GOO tailored covered stents led to less restenosis and reintervention rates compared to standard uncovered stents but with the same survival.

References

  1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(2):248-51 - PubMed
  2. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun;9(2):162-8 - PubMed
  3. Endoscopy. 2007 May;39(5):434-9 - PubMed
  4. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep;47(8-9):962-7 - PubMed
  5. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Mar;55(3):668-74 - PubMed
  6. Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):323-9 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Feb;39(2):124-8 - PubMed
  8. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2031-9 - PubMed
  9. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Dec;66(6):1206-10 - PubMed
  10. Gut Liver. 2010 Sep;4 Suppl 1:S32-8 - PubMed
  11. Korean J Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;13 Suppl 1:S98-103 - PubMed
  12. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006 Feb;17 (2 Pt 1):319-26 - PubMed
  13. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 May;69(6):1059-66 - PubMed
  14. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008 Nov-Dec;55(88):2091-5 - PubMed
  15. Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Jul;56(7):2030-6 - PubMed
  16. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(1):100-5 - PubMed
  17. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Aug;23(8):789-94 - PubMed
  18. Endoscopy. 2013;45(3):174-81 - PubMed
  19. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Mar;61(3):421-6 - PubMed
  20. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Apr;69(4):806-12 - PubMed
  21. Surg Today. 2011 May;41(5):637-42 - PubMed
  22. Radiology. 2000 Sep;216(3):758-63 - PubMed
  23. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Aug;66(2):256-64 - PubMed
  24. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Dec;60(6):916-20 - PubMed
  25. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jul;193(1):241-7 - PubMed
  26. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;39(10):1010-4 - PubMed
  27. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Dec;15(12 ):1443-9 - PubMed
  28. J Dig Dis. 2012 Dec;13(12):628-33 - PubMed
  29. Acta Radiol. 2013 Apr 1;54(3):267-71 - PubMed
  30. BMC Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun 08;7:18 - PubMed
  31. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;22(1):6-9 - PubMed
  32. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jul;23 (7 Pt 1):1056-62 - PubMed
  33. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 7;16(33):4206-9 - PubMed
  34. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(7):846-52 - PubMed

Publication Types