Display options
Share it on

Oncol Lett. 2015 Apr;9(4):1885-1888. doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2940. Epub 2015 Feb 06.

Efficacy of temozolomide and bevacizumab for the treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination of recurrent glioblastoma: A case report.

Oncology letters

Yoshiko Okita, Masahiro Nonaka, Toru Umehara, Yonehiro Kanemura, Yoshinori Kodama, Masayuki Mano, Shin Nakajima

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka 540-0006, Japan.
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka 540-0006, Japan ; Division of Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Clinical Research, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka 540-0006, Japan.
  3. Department of Central Laboratory and Surgical Pathology, Osaka National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Osaka 540-0006, Japan.

PMID: 25789061 PMCID: PMC4356381 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.2940

Abstract

The prognosis of leptomeningeal dissemination of recurrent glioblastoma is poor, and chemotherapy results in minimal palliative efficacy. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an established therapy for patients with malignant glioma and the standard of care in parenchymal gliomas; however, few reports have been published with regard to its use for the treatment of leptomeningeal dissemination. Only one report has indicated the radiographic response of leptomeningeal dissemination to a TMZ rechallenge, suggesting a potential causative effect. While bevacizumab is an effective therapy for recurrent glioblastoma, its effect on leptomeningeal dissemination of recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. The present study reports a case of leptomeningeal dissemination of recurrent glioblastoma in which transient neurological and radiological improvement was observed following chemotherapy with TMZ and bevacizumab. However, five months after the diagnosis of leptomeningeal dissemination the patient succumbed to the disease.

Keywords: bevacizumab; leptomeningeal dissemination; recurrent glioblastoma

References

  1. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2006 Jan;3(1):24-40 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):e14-6 - PubMed
  3. Neurosurgery. 1986 Aug;19(2):247-51 - PubMed
  4. J Neurooncol. 2011 Dec;105(3):663-5 - PubMed
  5. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23 ):2335-42 - PubMed
  6. Science. 2005 Jan 7;307(5706):58-62 - PubMed
  7. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007 Apr;6(4):273-86 - PubMed
  8. Neurosurgery. 1989 Oct;25(4):533-40 - PubMed
  9. Neurosurgery. 2003 Feb;52(2):324-29; discussion 330 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 27;357(26):2666-76 - PubMed
  11. Int J Neurosci. 2012 Nov;122(11):691-4 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 20;25(12):1539-44 - PubMed
  13. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143(1):25-9 - PubMed
  14. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2572-8 - PubMed
  15. Neuro Oncol. 2008 Apr;10(2):162-70 - PubMed
  16. Acta Neurol Scand. 1989 Feb;79(2):133-9 - PubMed
  17. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 31;349(5):427-34 - PubMed
  18. Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Feb;46(2):105-12 - PubMed
  19. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2013 May;75(3):251-61 - PubMed
  20. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;126(2-4):84-92 - PubMed
  21. J Breast Cancer. 2013 Mar;16(1):122-6 - PubMed
  22. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Apr;9(4):403-7 - PubMed
  23. Surg Neurol Int. 2013 May 02;4(Suppl 4):S265-88 - PubMed
  24. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun;43(6):587-95 - PubMed
  25. J Neurooncol. 2010 Jan;96(2):259-69 - PubMed
  26. J Neurooncol. 2010 Dec;100(3):443-7 - PubMed
  27. Neurosurgery. 1990 Oct;27(4):516-21; discussion 521-2 - PubMed
  28. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10 ):987-96 - PubMed
  29. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2542-50 - PubMed

Publication Types