Display options
Share it on

J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc. 2014;17(1):22-30. doi: 10.1298/jjpta.Vol17_004.

Differences in Cartilage Repair between Loading and Unloading Environments in the Rat Knee.

Journal of the Japanese Physical Therapy Association = Rigaku ryoho

Ikufumi Takahashi, Taro Matsuzaki, Shinya Yoshida, Ippei Kitade, Masahiro Hoso

Affiliations

  1. Department of Rehabilitation, Houju Memorial Hospital.
  2. School of Health Sciences, College of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University.
  3. Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University.
  4. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kanazawa University Hospital.
  5. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital.

PMID: 25792905 PMCID: PMC4316548 DOI: 10.1298/jjpta.Vol17_004

Abstract

We investigated the histopathological and immunohistochemical effects of loading on cartilage repair in rat full-thickness articular cartilage defects. A total of 40 male 9-week-old Wistar rats were studied. Full-thickness articular cartilage defects were created over the capsule at the loading portion in the medial condyle of the femur. Twenty rats were randomly allocated into each of the 2 groups: a loading group and a unloading group. Twenty rats from these 2 groups were later randomly allocated to each of the 2 groups for evaluation at 1 and 2 weeks after surgery. At the end of each period, knee joints were examined histopathologically and immunohistochemically. In both groups at 1 and 2 weeks, the defects were filled with a mixture of granulation tissue and some remnants of hyaline cartilage. The repair tissue was not stained with toluidine blue in both groups. Strong staining of type I collagen was observed in the repair tissue of both groups. The area stained with type I collagen was smaller in the unloading group than in the loading groups, and the stained area was smaller at 2 weeks than at 1 week. In the staining for type II collagen, apparent staining of type II collagen was observed in the repair tissue of both groups at 1 week. At 2 weeks, there was a tendency toward a higher degree of apparent staining in the loading group than in the unloading group. Accordingly, these results indicated that loading and unloading in the early phase of cartilage repair have both merits and demerits.

Keywords: Articular cartilage; full-thickness defect; mechanical loading

References

  1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Feb;(407):215-27 - PubMed
  2. Int J Sports Med. 2000 Jan;21(1):76-81 - PubMed
  3. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Mar;16(3):392-8 - PubMed
  4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Jun;(207):246-52 - PubMed
  5. Arthroscopy. 2005 Feb;21(2):152-8 - PubMed
  6. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2011 Dec;9(4):237-42 - PubMed
  7. J Biochem. 1999 May;125(5):966-75 - PubMed
  8. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Oct;36(10):728-38 - PubMed
  9. J Knee Surg. 2002 Summer;15(3):170-6 - PubMed
  10. J Orthop Res. 1997 Mar;15(2):181-8 - PubMed
  11. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000 Sep 15;381(2):205-12 - PubMed
  12. J Orthop Res. 2001 Nov;19(6):1140-6 - PubMed
  13. J Cell Sci. 1998 Jul 30;111 ( Pt 14):2067-76 - PubMed
  14. J Orthop Sci. 2005 Sep;10(5):508-14 - PubMed
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981 Sep;(159):223-47 - PubMed
  16. J Orthop Res. 2001 Jul;19(4):703-11 - PubMed
  17. Instr Course Lect. 2007;56:419-28 - PubMed
  18. J Orthop Res. 2003 Jan;21(1):110-6 - PubMed
  19. Arthroscopy. 2007 Jun;23(6):647-54 - PubMed
  20. Bone. 2009 Feb;44(2):295-305 - PubMed
  21. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008 Aug;16(8):961-4 - PubMed
  22. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2002 Jul;10(3):163-9 - PubMed
  23. Cells Tissues Organs. 2003;175(3):140-50 - PubMed
  24. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Nov;1211:37-50 - PubMed
  25. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Mar;64(3):460-6 - PubMed
  26. J Orthop Res. 2003 May;21(3):451-7 - PubMed
  27. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Feb;455:169-72 - PubMed
  28. J Orthop Res. 1999 Nov;17(6):870-9 - PubMed
  29. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Oct;36(10):774-94 - PubMed
  30. J Orthop Res. 2004 Jan;22(1):145-51 - PubMed
  31. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 May;(362):218-29 - PubMed
  32. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 May;(242):12-25 - PubMed
  33. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003;5(2):94-103 - PubMed
  34. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012 Apr;43(2):187-99, v - PubMed
  35. Biomaterials. 2004 Apr;25(9):1511-21 - PubMed
  36. J Vis Exp. 2011 Mar 10;(49): - PubMed
  37. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Oct;(391 Suppl):S362-9 - PubMed
  38. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Apr;75(4):532-53 - PubMed
  39. J Biomech Eng. 1999 Oct;121(5):433-41 - PubMed

Publication Types