Display options
Cite
Byrne BE, Pinto A, Aylin P, et al. Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England. Patient Saf Surg. 2015;9(1):2doi: 10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5.
Byrne, B. E., Pinto, A., Aylin, P., Bottle, A., Faiz, O. D., & Vincent, C. A. (2015). Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England. Patient safety in surgery, 9(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5
Byrne, Ben E, et al. "Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England." Patient safety in surgery vol. 9,1 (2015): 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5
Byrne BE, Pinto A, Aylin P, Bottle A, Faiz OD, Vincent CA. Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England. Patient Saf Surg. 2015 Jan 23;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5. eCollection 2015. PMID: 25621007; PMCID: PMC4304175.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Patient Saf Surg. 2015 Jan 23;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5. eCollection 2015.

Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England.

Patient safety in surgery

Ben E Byrne, Anna Pinto, Paul Aylin, Alex Bottle, Omar D Faiz, Charles A Vincent

Affiliations

  1. Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, Office 5.03, 5th Floor, Medical School Building, St Mary's Campus, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG UK.
  2. Dr Foster Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  3. Surgical Epidemiology, Trials and Outcome Centre (SETOC), St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex UK.
  4. Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

PMID: 25621007 PMCID: PMC4304175 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wide variation in the outcomes of colorectal surgery persists, despite a well-established evidence-base to inform clinical practice. This variation may be attributed to differences in quality of care, but we do not know what this means in practical terms of care delivery. This telephone interview study aimed to identify distinguishing characteristics in the organisation of care among colorectal units with the best length of stay results in England.

METHODS: Ten English National Health Service hospitals were identified with the shortest length of stay after elective colonic surgery between January 2011 and December 2012. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a senior colorectal surgeon and ward nurse, who were not informed of their performance, at each site. Audio recordings were professionally transcribed and thematically analysed for similarities and differences in practice between units.

RESULTS: All ten short length of stay units approached agreed to participate, and 19 of 20 interviews were recorded. These units standardised clinical care based upon an Enhanced Recovery Program. Beyond this, they organised the clinical team to efficiently and reliably deliver this package of care, with the majority of day-to-day care delivered by consultants and nurses. Patients were closely monitored for postoperative deterioration, using a combination of early warning scores, nurses' clinical judgement and regular senior medical review. Of note, operative volume and laparoscopy rates in these units were not statistically significantly different from the national average (p = 0.509 and p = 0.131, respectively). The postoperative analgesic strategy varied widely between units, from routine epidural use to local anaesthetic infiltration or patient-controlled analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS: The Enhanced Recovery Program may be seen as necessary but not sufficient to achieve the best length of stay results. In the study units, consultants and nurses led and delivered the majority of patient care on the ward. High quality teamwork helped detect and resolve clinical issues promptly, with nurses empowered to contact consultants directly if needed. Other units may learn from these teams by adopting protocol-based, consultant- or nurse-delivered care, and by improving coordination and communication between consultants and ward nurses.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Enhanced recovery; Interviews; Length of stay; Outcomes; Performance; Quality

References

  1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;29(3):309-20 - PubMed
  2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 4;46(7):1236-41 - PubMed
  3. Ann Surg. 2009 Dec;250(6):901-7 - PubMed
  4. Colorectal Dis. 2008 Oct;10 (8):837-45 - PubMed
  5. BMJ. 1998 Apr 11;316(7138):1154-7 - PubMed
  6. Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):725-31 - PubMed
  7. Gut. 2013 Mar;62(3):423-9 - PubMed
  8. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1157-65 - PubMed
  9. Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):10-31 - PubMed
  10. BMJ. 2007 May 19;334(7602):1044 - PubMed
  11. Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Dec;11(6):524-8 - PubMed
  12. Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):58-65 - PubMed
  13. J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Oct;185(4):341-51 - PubMed
  14. J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jun;204(6):1166-77 - PubMed
  15. Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):132-9 - PubMed
  16. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Dec;27(12):1549-54 - PubMed
  17. Lancet. 2004 Apr 3;363(9415):1147-54 - PubMed
  18. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):667-78 - PubMed
  19. Circulation. 2006 Feb 28;113(8):1079-85 - PubMed
  20. J Cancer. 2012;3:49-57 - PubMed
  21. Med Care. 2007 Dec;45(12):1195-204 - PubMed
  22. Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Aug;13(4):344-8 - PubMed
  23. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:405-15 - PubMed
  24. BMJ. 2011 Aug 16;343:d4836 - PubMed
  25. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Nov;209(5):557-64 - PubMed
  26. J Neurosci Nurs. 2011 Dec;43(6):329-36 - PubMed
  27. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Apr;33(4):461-5; discussion 466 - PubMed
  28. Br J Surg. 2004 Jun;91(6):774-7 - PubMed
  29. N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1368-75 - PubMed
  30. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206 - PubMed
  31. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109 (3):368-75 - PubMed
  32. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD007635 - PubMed
  33. Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303 - PubMed
  34. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 17;8(4):e61476 - PubMed
  35. Implement Sci. 2009 May 08;4:25 - PubMed

Publication Types