Display options
Share it on

Patient Saf Surg. 2015 Jan 24;9(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13037-014-0051-4. eCollection 2015.

Compartment elasticity measured by pressure-related ultrasound to determine patients "at risk" for compartment syndrome: an experimental in vitro study.

Patient safety in surgery

Richard Martin Sellei, Simon Johannes Hingmann, Philipp Kobbe, Christian Weber, John Edward Grice, Frauke Zimmerman, Sabine Jeromin, Frank Hildebrand, Hans-Christoph Pape

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Aachen University Medical Center, Aachen, Germany ; Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Sana Klinikum Offenbach am Main, Offenbach am Main, Germany.
  2. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Aachen University Medical Center, Aachen, Germany.
  3. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
  4. Helmholtz-Institute for biomedical engineering, Chair of medical engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

PMID: 25621009 PMCID: PMC4305259 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-014-0051-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision-making in treatment of an acute compartment syndrome is based on clinical assessment, supported by invasive monitoring. Thus, evolving compartment syndrome may require repeated pressure measurements. In suspected cases of potential compartment syndromes clinical assessment alone seems to be unreliable. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a non-invasive application estimating whole compartmental elasticity by ultrasound, which may improve accuracy of diagnostics.

METHODS: In an in vitro model, using an artificial container simulating dimensions of the human anterior tibial compartment, intra-compartmental pressures (p) were raised subsequently up to 80 mmHg by infusion of saline solution. The compartmental depth (mm) in the cross-section view was measured before and after manual probe compression (100 mmHg) upon the surface resulting in a linear compartmental displacement (∆d). This was repeated at rising compartmental pressures. The resulting displacements were related to the corresponding intra-compartmental pressures simulated in our model. A hypothesized relationship between pressures related compartmental displacement and the elasticity at elevated compartment pressures was investigated.

RESULTS: With rising compartmental pressures, a non-linear, reciprocal proportional relation between the displacement (mm) and the intra-compartmental pressure (mmHg) occurred. The Pearson coefficient showed a high correlation (r(2) = -0.960). The intra-observer reliability value kappa resulted in a statistically high reliability (κ = 0.840). The inter-observer value indicated a fair reliability (κ = 0.640).

CONCLUSIONS: Our model reveals that a strong correlation between compartmental strain displacements assessed by ultrasound and the intra-compartmental pressure changes occurs. Further studies are required to prove whether this assessment is transferable to human muscle tissue. Determining the complete compartmental elasticity by ultrasound enhancement, this application may improve detection of early signs of potential compartment syndrome.

Keywords: Compartment syndrome; Elasticity measurement; Elastography; Intra-compartmental pressure; Non-invasive diagnostic

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Jan;78(1):95-8 - PubMed
  2. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7(3):199-210 - PubMed
  3. Arch Surg. 1975 Nov;110(11):1311-3 - PubMed
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994 Sep;76(9):1285-92 - PubMed
  5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Jul;(167):185-90 - PubMed
  6. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975 Nov-Dec;(113):8-14 - PubMed
  7. Clin J Sport Med. 2013 Jul;23 (4):305-11 - PubMed
  8. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Mar;82(2):200-3 - PubMed
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92(4):863-70 - PubMed
  10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Apr;(433):30-7 - PubMed
  11. Ultrason Imaging. 1991 Apr;13(2):111-34 - PubMed
  12. J Orthop Trauma. 2002 Sep;16(8):572-7 - PubMed
  13. Acta Radiol. 2011 Feb 1;52(1):99-105 - PubMed
  14. J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Sep;22(8):581-7 - PubMed
  15. Physiol Meas. 2005 Jun;26(3):215-28 - PubMed
  16. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(3):231-9 - PubMed
  17. J Trauma. 1996 Mar;40(3):342-4 - PubMed
  18. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):361-7 - PubMed
  19. J Trauma. 1987 Jan;27(1):79-81 - PubMed
  20. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000 Aug;82(5-6):361-7 - PubMed
  21. Orthopedics. 2003 Dec;26(12):1215-8 - PubMed
  22. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11):875-86 - PubMed
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984 Jan;66(1):93-7 - PubMed
  24. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Sep;36(9):627-35 - PubMed
  25. Br J Surg. 2002 Apr;89(4):397-412 - PubMed
  26. J Trauma. 1994 Jul;37(1):50-8 - PubMed
  27. Ultrasound Q. 2007 Dec;23 (4):255-68 - PubMed
  28. J Biomech. 2005 Aug;38(8):1629-35 - PubMed

Publication Types