Display options
Cite
Goel VK, Mehta A, Jangra J, et al. Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation. SAS J. 2007;1(1):46-54doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0010-RR.
Goel, V. K., Mehta, A., Jangra, J., Faizan, A., Kiapour, A., Hoy, R. W., & Fauth, A. R. (2007). Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation. SAS journal, 1(1), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2006-0010-RR
Goel, Vijay K, et al. "Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation." SAS journal vol. 1,1 (2007): 46-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/SASJ-2006-0010-RR
Goel VK, Mehta A, Jangra J, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Hoy RW, Fauth AR. Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation. SAS J. 2007 Feb 01;1(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0010-RR. eCollection 2007. PMID: 25802578; PMCID: PMC4365566.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

SAS J. 2007 Feb 01;1(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0010-RR. eCollection 2007.

Anatomic Facet Replacement System (AFRS) Restoration of Lumbar Segment Mechanics to Intact: A Finite Element Study and In Vitro Cadaver Investigation.

SAS journal

Vijay K Goel, Ankit Mehta, Jayant Jangra, Ahmed Faizan, Ali Kiapour, Robert W Hoy, Andrew R Fauth

Affiliations

  1. The Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence, Departments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Ohio.
  2. Facet Solutions Inc, Logan, Utah.

PMID: 25802578 PMCID: PMC4365566 DOI: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0010-RR

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many decompression procedures involve complete or partial facetectomy. Spinal fusion usually stabilizes the motion segment after complete facetectomies. However, problems with fusion, such as adjacent-level degeneration, have increased interest in motion- preservation technologies. Facet arthroplasty may become an important posterior motion-preservation device, but its biomechanical literature is sparse.

METHODS: We conducted an in vitro investigation and finite element study to compare the biomechanical effects of an artificial facet system to the intact spine. In the in vitro study, we tested human osteo-ligamentous segments (L3-S1) in intact, injured, and artificial facet-repaired conditions. For the finite element study, we used a 3-dimensional ligamentous L3-S1 segment model. We simulated destabilization in the intact model by removing the facets across the L4-L5 functional unit, then repaired it with appropriately sized facet implants and compared the ranges of motion, facet loads, disc pressures, and device loads. We also analyzed a finite element model with a rigid posterior pedicle-rod fixation system. We subjected the cadaveric specimens and the models to 400 N of follower load plus a 10 Nm moment in extension, flexion, bending, and rotation. We used a novel technique to apply the follower load in the finite element models such that preload induced minimal vertebral rotation during the range of motion.

RESULTS: The predicted ranges of motion for the intact and implanted models were consistent with cadaver data. After destabilization and facet replacement, the artificial facet system restored motion in all loading modes to intact values. The implant facet loads were similar to intact facet loads in extension and axial rotation, but less in lateral bending. The intradiscal pressure at the implanted level for the facet replacement device was similar to the intact pressure, whereas with the rigid system the intradiscal pressure was up to 70% less than the intact pressure. The maximum von-Mises stress predicted in the facet replacement construct was 85 MPa in extension at the bone-pedicle screw interface, compared with 174 MPa in the rigid system. Contact stresses at implant mating surfaces were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS: The artificial facet system replicated natural facet kinematics. The cadaveric ranges of motion and the predicted finite element-based data indicated that the implant can "restore" the normal function of the segment after artificial facet replacement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Compared to rigid posterior pedicle-rod fixation, the artificial facet system restored the intact mechanics at the implanted level and may prevent adjacent-level degeneration.

Keywords: artificial facet; biomechanics; finite element technique; lumbar spine

References

  1. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000 Oct;86(6):590-7 - PubMed
  2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Mar 15;20(6):689-98 - PubMed
  3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 15;30(24):2755-64 - PubMed
  4. Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):85-94 - PubMed
  5. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 1;30(1):62-7 - PubMed
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 1;29(15):1624-31 - PubMed
  7. Spine J. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):239-43 - PubMed
  8. J Biomech. 1993 Apr-May;26(4-5):427-38 - PubMed
  9. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:313-9 - PubMed
  10. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar;8(2):122-30 - PubMed
  11. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:403-7 - PubMed
  12. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Jul 15;23(14):1550-8 - PubMed
  13. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Mar;78(3):403-11 - PubMed
  14. J Arthroplasty. 2004 Dec;19(8 Suppl 3):5-11 - PubMed
  15. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 15;26(6):E122-9 - PubMed
  16. J Neurosurg. 2000 Jul;93(1 Suppl):102-8 - PubMed
  17. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr;20(3):350-7 - PubMed
  18. J Biomech. 2006;39(2):348-53 - PubMed
  19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 15;29(16):1755-63 - PubMed
  20. J Biomech Eng. 1998 Apr;120(2):273-80 - PubMed
  21. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Mar;51(3):443-9 - PubMed
  22. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:303-12 - PubMed
  23. J Biomech Eng. 1999 Apr;121(2):215-21 - PubMed
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Nov;15(11):1142-7 - PubMed
  25. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):418-23 - PubMed

Publication Types