Display options
Share it on

PeerJ. 2015 Mar 17;3:e829. doi: 10.7717/peerj.829. eCollection 2015.

Evolution of a research field-a micro (RNA) example.

PeerJ

Máire-Caitlín Casey, Michael J Kerin, James A Brown, Karl J Sweeney

Affiliations

  1. Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland , Galway , Ireland.

PMID: 25802804 PMCID: PMC4369334 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.829

Abstract

Background. Every new scientific field can be traced back to a single, seminal publication. Therefore, a bibliometric analysis can yield significant insights into the history and potential future of a research field. This year marks 21 years since that first ground-breaking microRNA (miRNA) publication. Here, we make the case that the miRNA field is mature, utilising bibliometrics. Methods. Utilising the Web of Science™ (WoS) database publication and citation information, we charted the history of miRNA-related publications, describing and dissecting contributions by publication type (plus category, pay-per-view or open access), journal (highlighting dominant journals), by country, citations and languages. Results. We found that the United States of America (USA) publishes the most miRNA papers, followed by China and Germany. Significantly, publications attributed to the USA also receive the most citations per publication, followed by a close grouping of England, Germany and France. We also describe the relevance and acceptance of the miRNA field to different research areas, through its uptake in areas from oncology to plant sciences. Exploring the recent momentous change in publishing, we find that although pay-per view articles vastly out-number open-access articles, the citation rate of pay-per-view articles is currently less than double that of open-access. Conclusions. We believe the trends described here represent the typical evolution of a research field. By analysing publications, citations and distribution patterns, key moments in the evolution of this research area are recognised, indicating the maturation of the miRNA field and providing guidance for future research endeavours.

Keywords: Bibliometric; Let-7; Lin-4; miRNA; microRNA

References

  1. Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Jun;9(6):654-9 - PubMed
  2. Nature. 2014 Jun 12;510(7504):218 - PubMed
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jul 17;104(29):12052-6 - PubMed
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 28;103(48):18255-60 - PubMed
  5. BMC Med. 2012 Jul 17;10:73 - PubMed
  6. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54847 - PubMed
  7. Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Feb;9(2):102-14 - PubMed
  8. J Exp Med. 2007 Jul 9;204(7):1553-8 - PubMed
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 26;99(24):15524-9 - PubMed
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1608-13 - PubMed
  11. PLoS One. 2007 Jul 11;2(7):e610 - PubMed
  12. Cell. 1993 Dec 3;75(5):843-54 - PubMed
  13. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 07;4(8):e6544 - PubMed
  14. Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):797-9 - PubMed
  15. Cell. 2004 Jan 23;116(2):281-97 - PubMed
  16. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009 Jun;9(6):703-711 - PubMed
  17. Cell. 2009 Jun 12;137(6):1005-17 - PubMed
  18. Science. 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1931-4 - PubMed
  19. Nature. 2000 Nov 2;408(6808):86-9 - PubMed

Publication Types