Display options
Cite
Ahmadi A, Soori H. Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article. J Renal Inj Prev. 2015;4(1):4-8doi: 10.12861/jrip.2015.02.
Ahmadi, A., & Soori, H. (2015). Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article. Journal of renal injury prevention, 4(1), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.12861/jrip.2015.02
Ahmadi, Ali, and Soori, Hamid. "Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article." Journal of renal injury prevention vol. 4,1 (2015): 4-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.12861/jrip.2015.02
Ahmadi A, Soori H. Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article. J Renal Inj Prev. 2015 Mar 01;4(1):4-8. doi: 10.12861/jrip.2015.02. eCollection 2015. PMID: 25848638; PMCID: PMC4381032.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Renal Inj Prev. 2015 Mar 01;4(1):4-8. doi: 10.12861/jrip.2015.02. eCollection 2015.

Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article.

Journal of renal injury prevention

Ali Ahmadi, Hamid Soori

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
  2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

PMID: 25848638 PMCID: PMC4381032 DOI: 10.12861/jrip.2015.02

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of articles' methodology is one of the important factors which is considered by researchers.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine statistical guidelines on promotion of methodology's quality in the articles concerning medical sciences, particularly nephrology, to assist authors and reviewers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a systematic review. Initially, the keywords "Epidemiologic Methods/analysis" [Mesh] OR "Epidemiologic Methods/epidemiology" and "reporting" were selected in Medline database. Then, reliable databases were searched for relevant publications. Being relevant, containing viewpoints, and recommending statistical guidelines as well as approval of at least two of the three examiners of articles were determined as the inclusion criteria into the study.

RESULTS: Two hundred relevant articles were retrieved. Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. By the examined articles, 30 applied points have determinative role for improving and promoting quality of articles methodology. Of the important points, introducing and describing target community and statistical population, mentioning article title, introducing independent and dependent variables as well as confounders, reporting sample size for subgroups and the whole study, summarizing the data according to their statistical distribution (reporting mean and standard deviation for data with normal distribution), reporting the type of rate (incidence, survival), ratio (odds, hazard) or risk (absolute, relative, difference) with 95% CI and the used software could be mentioned.

CONCLUSION: The most important factors contributing greatly to the quality of articles' methodology on nephrology were reported in the present study. Applying these factors by articles authors and reviewers could lead to improve articles' and journals' quality. In addition, use of the findings of the present study in articles' materials and methods could avoid research errors.

Keywords: Epidemiologic approaches; Epidemiologic research; Methodology; Statistical analysis; Statistical reporting

References

  1. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;35(2):208-11 - PubMed
  2. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;61(3):277-81 - PubMed
  3. Indian J Med Sci. 2008 Apr;62(4):134-40 - PubMed
  4. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Apr 25;12:60 - PubMed
  5. J Res Med Sci. 2014 Sep;19(9):850-4 - PubMed
  6. BMJ. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):226-31 - PubMed
  7. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Oct;7(5):504-11 - PubMed
  8. PLoS One. 2010 May 25;5(5):e10822 - PubMed
  9. JAMA. 2002 Jun 5;287(21):2817-20 - PubMed
  10. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;34(7):740-4 - PubMed
  11. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Feb;108(2):266-73 - PubMed
  12. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Oct;95(4):315-21; quiz 322, 380 - PubMed
  13. J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4 Suppl):1906-10 - PubMed
  14. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 May 15;141(10):896-906 - PubMed
  15. PLoS Med. 2012;9(5):1-12 - PubMed
  16. Lancet. 2009 Jun 20;373(9681):2091-3 - PubMed
  17. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2011 Dec;85(6):583-91 - PubMed
  18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Dec;467(12):3334-9 - PubMed
  19. BMJ. 2013 Oct 04;347:f5975 - PubMed
  20. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55 - PubMed
  21. BMJ. 1999 Jun 19;318(7199):1667 - PubMed
  22. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;620:563-98 - PubMed
  23. PLoS One. 2007 Mar 28;2(3):e332 - PubMed
  24. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013 Jan-Apr;10(1):13-6 - PubMed
  25. ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jun;76(6):427-31 - PubMed
  26. N Engl J Med. 1987 Aug 13;317(7):426-32 - PubMed
  27. East Afr J Public Health. 2009 Apr;6 Suppl(1):1-7 - PubMed
  28. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Apr;90(4):514-6 - PubMed
  29. J Med Ethics. 2001 Jun;27(3):172-6 - PubMed
  30. Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):119-26 - PubMed
  31. Lancet. 2005 Apr 9-15;365(9467):1348-53 - PubMed
  32. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jan 25;14:15 - PubMed
  33. Stat Med. 1999 Aug 15;18(15):1903-42 - PubMed

Publication Types