Display options
Share it on

Front Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 09;6:3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00003. eCollection 2015.

Thinking Back about a Positive Event: The Impact of Processing Style on Positive Affect.

Frontiers in psychiatry

Sabine Nelis, Emily A Holmes, Rosa Palmieri, Guglielmo Bellelli, Filip Raes

Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
  2. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit , Cambridge , UK ; Department for Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
  3. Libera Università Maria Ss. Assunta (LUMSA) University , Taranto , Italy ; EMPEA: Clinical Research Centre for Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy , Bari , Italy.
  4. University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari , Italy.

PMID: 25806003 PMCID: PMC4353183 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00003

Abstract

The manner in which individuals recall an autobiographical positive life event has affective consequences. Two studies addressed the processing styles during positive memory recall in a non-clinical sample. Participants retrieved a positive memory, which was self-generated (Study 1, n = 70) or experimenter-chosen (i.e., academic achievement, Study 2, n = 159), followed by the induction of one of three processing styles (between-subjects): in Study 1, a "concrete/imagery" vs. "abstract/verbal" processing style was compared. In Study 2, a "concrete/imagery," "abstract/verbal," and "comparative/verbal" processing style were compared. The processing of a personal memory in a concrete/imagery-based way led to a larger increase in positive affect compared to abstract/verbal processing in Study 1, as well as compared to comparative/verbal thinking in Study 2. Results of Study 2 further suggest that it is making unfavorable verbal comparisons that may hinder affective benefits to positive memories (rather than general abstract/verbal processing per se). The comparative/verbal thinking style failed to lead to improvements in positive affect, and with increasing levels of depressive symptoms it had a more negative impact on change in positive affect. We found no evidence that participant's tendency to have dampening thoughts in response to positive affect in daily life contributed to the affective impact of positive memory recall. The results support the potential for current trainings in boosting positive memories and mental imagery, and underline the search for parameters that determine at times deleterious outcomes of abstract/verbal memory processing in the face of positive information.

Keywords: abstract/verbal processing; memory; mental imagery; positive; processing style; recall

References

  1. J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:212-8 - PubMed
  2. Memory. 2013;21(4):423-30 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Psychopathol. 2013 May 13;4(5):502-528 - PubMed
  4. Emotion. 2008 Dec;8(6):875-9 - PubMed
  5. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Dec;49(12):885-91 - PubMed
  6. Behav Ther. 2006 Sep;37(3):281-91 - PubMed
  7. J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 May;113(2):179-88 - PubMed
  8. Cognit Ther Res. 2008 Aug 1;32(4):507-525 - PubMed
  9. Behav Res Ther. 2004 Sep;42(9):1037-52 - PubMed
  10. Conscious Cogn. 2009 Dec;18(4):877-90 - PubMed
  11. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 29;356(1413):1375-84 - PubMed
  12. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009 Feb;118(1):76-88 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Pers. 2012 Mar;26(2):145-157 - PubMed
  14. J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Nov;113(4):654-60 - PubMed
  15. Memory. 2009 Aug;17(6):624-34 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Res. 2014 Jul;78(4):566-73 - PubMed
  17. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 May;37(5):714-26 - PubMed
  18. Cogn Emot. 2006 Apr 1;20(3-4):466-87 - PubMed
  19. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Oct;79(5):618-28 - PubMed
  20. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jun;46(6):748-56 - PubMed
  21. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38 Suppl 1:21-8 - PubMed
  22. Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):844-58 - PubMed
  23. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):326-40 - PubMed
  24. J Affect Disord. 2012 Dec 10;141(2-3):474-9 - PubMed
  25. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 May;112(2):203-11 - PubMed
  26. J Exp Psychopathol. 2013;4(5):471-484 - PubMed
  27. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;33(3):343-60 - PubMed
  28. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Dec;53(6):1004-14 - PubMed
  29. Cogn Emot. 2011 Sep;25(6):1087-103 - PubMed
  30. Cogn Emot. 2012;26(1):75-82 - PubMed
  31. Emotion. 2012 Jun;12(3):470-8 - PubMed
  32. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Oct;81(5):793-9 - PubMed
  33. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):155-67 - PubMed
  34. Emotion. 2005 Dec;5(4):489-97 - PubMed
  35. Behav Ther. 2006 Sep;37(3):237-47 - PubMed
  36. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;40(1):24-38 - PubMed
  37. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Feb;92(2):232-48 - PubMed
  38. Memory. 2009 Nov;17(8):892-903 - PubMed
  39. Memory. 2014;22(5):525-35 - PubMed
  40. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:1-25 - PubMed
  41. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 May;95(2):144-9 - PubMed
  42. Emotion. 2008 Jun;8(3):364-78 - PubMed
  43. Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;3(1):91-111 - PubMed
  44. Emotion. 2013 Apr;13(2):290-301 - PubMed
  45. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Aug;116(3):484-90 - PubMed
  46. Behav Res Ther. 2008 Dec;46(12):1251-8 - PubMed
  47. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;44(2):165-71 - PubMed
  48. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):503-16 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support