Display options
Share it on

Pain Ther. 2015 Jun;4(1):89-105. doi: 10.1007/s40122-015-0035-9. Epub 2015 Apr 25.

Comparative Usability Study of a Novel Auto-Injector and an Intranasal System for Naloxone Delivery.

Pain and therapy

Evan T Edwards, Eric S Edwards, Erin Davis, Maureen Mulcare, Michael Wiklund, Glen Kelley

Affiliations

  1. kaleo, Inc., Richmond, VA, USA, [email protected].

PMID: 25910473 PMCID: PMC4470965 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-015-0035-9

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The standard of care for reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression associated with opioid overdose is injectable naloxone. This study compared the usability of two naloxone delivery devices, a naloxone auto-injector (NAI) and a naloxone intranasal delivery system (NXN), in the administration of naloxone during a simulated opioid overdose emergency. NAI (EVZIO (®) ; kaleo, Inc., Richmond, VA, USA) is a Food and Drug Administration approved single-use pre-filled auto-injector containing 0.4 mg of naloxone.

METHODS: Study participants were randomly assigned to administer naloxone using NAI and NXN, sequentially. The primary endpoint was successful administration of a simulated dose of naloxone into a mannequin during a simulated opioid emergency, both before and after receiving training. Secondary endpoints included using the NAI or NXN in accordance with the instructions-for-use and the comparative measurement of successful completion time of administration for both NAI and NXN.

RESULTS: A total of 42 healthy participants aged 18-65 years were enrolled in the study. The proportion of participants able to successfully administer a simulated dose of naloxone was significantly greater for NAI compared to NXN both before (90.5% vs. 0.0%, respectively, P < 0.0001) and after (100% vs. 57.1%, respectively, P < 0.0001) participant training. The proportion of participants able to administer a simulated dose of naloxone in accordance with the instructions-for-use was also significantly greater for NAI compared to NXN before (85.7% vs. 0.0%, respectively, P < 0.0001) and after (100% vs. 0.0%, respectively, P < 0.0001) participant training. The average time to task completion for administration attempt before training was 0.9 ± 0.25 min for NAI versus 6.0 ± 4.76 min for NXN and after training was 0.5 ± 0.15 min for NAI versus 2.0 ± 2.15 min for NXN.

CONCLUSION: Laypersons experienced substantially greater success administering a simulated dose of naloxone, both before and after training, using NAI versus NXN during a simulated opioid overdose emergency. No participants correctly used NXN without training.

References

  1. J Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;29(3):265-71 - PubMed
  2. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2002 Jan-Mar;6(1):54-8 - PubMed
  3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Feb 17;61(6):101-5 - PubMed
  4. Acad Emerg Med. 1996 Jul;3(7):660-7 - PubMed
  5. NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Sep;(166):1-8 - PubMed
  6. BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 01;14:297 - PubMed
  7. J Safety Res. 2012 Sep;43(4):283-9 - PubMed
  8. Med J Aust. 2005 Jan 3;182(1):24-7 - PubMed
  9. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 January-March;19(1):138-139 - PubMed
  10. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):893-6 - PubMed
  11. Addiction. 2009 Dec;104(12):2067-74 - PubMed
  12. BMJ. 2013 Jan 30;346:f174 - PubMed
  13. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Nov;50(10):1266-70 - PubMed
  14. Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Mar;28(3):296-303 - PubMed
  15. Addiction. 2005 Dec;100(12):1823-31 - PubMed

Publication Types