Display options
Share it on

Surg Neurol Int. 2015 Apr 09;6:57. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.154775. eCollection 2015.

BAER suppression during posterior fossa dural opening.

Surgical neurology international

Christopher B Shields, Lisa B E Shields, Yi Dan Jiang, Tom Yao, Yi Ping Zhang, David A Sun

Affiliations

  1. Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 1102, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
  2. Impulse Monitoring Inc., 10420 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 250, Columbia, MD 21044, USA.

PMID: 25883849 PMCID: PMC4399168 DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.154775

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative monitoring with brainstem auditory evoked responses (BAER) provides an early warning signal of potential neurological injury and may avert tissue damage to the auditory pathway or brainstem. Unexplained loss of the BAER signal in the operating room may present a dilemma to the neurosurgeon.

METHODS: This paper documents two patients who displayed a unique mechanism of suppression of the BAER apparent within minutes following dural opening for resection of a posterior fossa meningioma.

RESULTS: In two patients with anterior cerebellopontine angle and clival meningiomas, there was a significant deterioration of the BAER soon after durotomy but prior to cerebellar retraction and tumor removal. Intracranial structures in the posterior fossa lying between the tumor and dural opening were shifted posteriorly after durotomy.

CONCLUSION: We hypothesized that the cochlear nerve and vessels entering the acoustic meatus were compressed or stretched when subjected to tissue shift. This movement caused cochlear nerve dysfunction that resulted in BAER suppression. BAER was partially restored after the tumor was decompressed, dura repaired, and bone replaced. BAER was not suppressed following durotomy for removal of a meningioma lying posterior to the cochlear complex. Insight into the mechanisms of durotomy-induced BAER inhibition would allay the neurosurgeon's anxiety during the operation.

Keywords: Brainstem auditory evoked responses; durotomy; internal auditory meatus; posterior fossa brain tumor

References

  1. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;75(3):293-6 - PubMed
  2. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2001 Jan;28(1):85-94 - PubMed
  3. J Neurosurg. 2008 Sep;109(3):410-5 - PubMed
  4. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:647258 - PubMed
  5. Anesthesiology. 2009 Aug;111(2):340-55 - PubMed
  6. Neurochirurgie. 2002 Nov;48(5):387-97 - PubMed
  7. Laryngoscope. 1999 Apr;109(4):591-4 - PubMed
  8. Anesthesiology. 2003 Sep;99(3):716-37 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;26(2):70-5 - PubMed
  10. Crit Care Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1736-40 - PubMed
  11. Laryngoscope. 1985 Nov;95(11):1318-22 - PubMed
  12. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Dec;28(6):566-81 - PubMed
  13. Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4495-503 - PubMed
  14. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):206 - PubMed
  15. Surg Neurol. 1989 Mar;31(3):246 - PubMed
  16. Asian J Neurosurg. 2010 Jan;5(1):60-7 - PubMed
  17. J Neurosurg. 2011 May;114(5):1232-40 - PubMed
  18. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Oct;19(5):396-408 - PubMed
  19. J Clin Monit. 1992 Jul;8(3):231-5 - PubMed
  20. Neurosurgery. 2004 Jan;54(1):97-104; discussion 104-6 - PubMed
  21. Br J Audiol. 1998 Dec;32(6):387-98 - PubMed
  22. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Dec;95(5):538-42 - PubMed
  23. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2009;34:85-110 - PubMed
  24. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;90(1-2):45-52 - PubMed
  25. Med Eng Phys. 2010 Mar;32(2):168-73 - PubMed

Publication Types