Display options
Cite
Lagler K, Schindelegger M, Böhm J, et al. GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40(6):1069-1073doi: 10.1002/grl.50288.
Lagler, K., Schindelegger, M., Böhm, J., Krásná, H., & Nilsson, T. (2013). GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophysical research letters, 40(6), 1069-1073. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50288
Lagler, K, et al. "GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques." Geophysical research letters vol. 40,6 (2013): 1069-1073. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50288
Lagler K, Schindelegger M, Böhm J, Krásná H, Nilsson T. GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophys Res Lett. 2013 Mar 28;40(6):1069-1073. doi: 10.1002/grl.50288. Epub 2013 Mar 22. PMID: 25821263; PMCID: PMC4373150.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Geophys Res Lett. 2013 Mar 28;40(6):1069-1073. doi: 10.1002/grl.50288. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

GPT2: Empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques.

Geophysical research letters

K Lagler, M Schindelegger, J Böhm, H Krásná, T Nilsson

Affiliations

  1. Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation (Research Group Advanced Geodesy), Vienna University of Technology Vienna, Austria ; Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry (Geosensors and Engineering Geodesy) ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
  2. Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation (Research Group Advanced Geodesy), Vienna University of Technology Vienna, Austria.
  3. Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation (Research Group Advanced Geodesy), Vienna University of Technology Vienna, Austria ; Section 1.1, GPS/GALILEO Earth Observation, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, Germany.

PMID: 25821263 PMCID: PMC4373150 DOI: 10.1002/grl.50288

Abstract

Up to now, state-of-the-art empirical slant delay modeling for processing observations from radio space geodetic techniques has been provided by a combination of two empirical models. These are GPT (Global Pressure and Temperature) and GMF (Global Mapping Function), both operating on the basis of long-term averages of surface values from numerical weather models. Weaknesses in GPT/GMF, specifically their limited spatial and temporal variability, are largely eradicated by a new, combined model GPT2, which provides pressure, temperature, lapse rate, water vapor pressure, and mapping function coefficients at any site, resting upon a global 5° grid of mean values, annual, and semi-annual variations in all parameters. Built on ERA-Interim data, GPT2 brings forth improved empirical slant delays for geophysical studies. Compared to GPT/GMF, GPT2 yields a 40% reduction of annual and semi-annual amplitude differences in station heights with respect to a solution based on instantaneous local pressure values and the Vienna mapping functions 1, as shown with a series of global VLBI (Very Long Baseline Interferometry) solutions.

Publication Types