Display options
Share it on

Cogn Dev. 2015 Apr-Jun;34:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.010.

The Effect of Realistic Contexts on Ontological Judgments of Novel Entities.

Cognitive development

Jennifer Van Reet, Ashley M Pinkham, Angeline S Lillard

Affiliations

  1. University of Virginia.

PMID: 25914442 PMCID: PMC4407999 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.010

Abstract

Although a great deal of research has focused on ontological judgments in preschoolers, very little has examined ontological judgments in older children. The present study asked 10-year-olds and adults (N = 94) to judge the reality status of known real, known imagined, and novel entities presented in simple and elaborate contexts and to explain their judgments. Although judgments were generally apt, participants were more likely to endorse imagined and novel entities when the entities were presented in elaborate contexts. When asked to explain their reasoning, participants at both ages cited firsthand experience for real entities and general knowledge for imagined entities. For novel entities, participants referred most to indirect experiences when entities were presented in simple contexts and to general knowledge when those entities were presented in elaborate contexts. These results suggest that rich contextual information continues to be an important influence on ontological judgments past the preschool years.

Keywords: explanations; middle childhood; ontology; reality status; testimony

References

  1. Dev Sci. 2006 Jan;9(1):76-96 - PubMed
  2. Child Dev. 2013 Sep-Oct;84(5):1496-510 - PubMed
  3. Cogn Psychol. 2010 Nov;61(3):248-72 - PubMed
  4. Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):177-94 - PubMed
  5. Dev Sci. 2011 Jan;14(1):1-8 - PubMed
  6. J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Aug;60(1):57-83 - PubMed
  7. Cognition. 2009 Sep;112(3):367-80 - PubMed
  8. Child Dev. 2006 Nov-Dec;77(6):1778-93 - PubMed
  9. Cognition. 2009 Nov;113(2):213-25 - PubMed
  10. Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;46(2):437-45 - PubMed
  11. Dev Sci. 2004 Sep;7(4):456-68 - PubMed
  12. Child Dev. 1997 Dec;68(6):991-1011 - PubMed
  13. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:419-39 - PubMed
  14. Psychol Sci. 2005 May;16(5):385-90 - PubMed
  15. Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):135-8 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):757-8 - PubMed
  17. Child Dev. 2005 Nov-Dec;76(6):1261-77 - PubMed
  18. Child Dev. 1993 Feb;64(1):1-17 - PubMed
  19. Child Dev. 2007 May-Jun;78(3):1015-32 - PubMed
  20. Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):151-60 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support