Display options
Share it on

Plast Surg (Oakv). 2015;23(1):35-9.

Inhibitory effects of low-level laser therapy on skin-flap survival in a rat model.

Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.)

Cristiano S Baldan, Igor Fb Masson, Ivaldo Esteves Júnior, Alessandra Maria S Baldan, Aline F P Machado, Raquel A Casaroto, Richard E Liebano

Affiliations

  1. Paulista University, São Paulo, Brazil.

PMID: 25821771 PMCID: PMC4364147

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have demonstrated the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on skin flap viability, the role of higher doses has been poorly investigated.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the inhibitory effect of the LLLT (λ=670 nm) on the viability of random skin flaps in a rat model using an irradiation energy of 2.79 J at each point.

METHODS: Sixteen Wistar rats were randomly assigned into two groups: sham laser irradiation (n=8); and active laser irradiation (n=8). Animals in the active laser irradiation group were irradiated with a 670 nm diode laser with an energy of 2.79 J/point, a power output 30 mW, a beam area of 0.028 cm(2), an energy density of 100 J/cm(2), an irradiance of 1.07 W/cm(2) for 93 s/point. Irradiation was performed in 12 points in the cranial skin flap portion. The total energy irradiated on the tissue was 33.48 J. The necrotic area was evaluated on postoperative day 7.

RESULTS: The sham laser irradiation group presented a mean (± SD) necrotic area of 47.96±3.81%, whereas the active laser irradiation group presented 62.24±7.28%. There was a significant difference in skin-flap necrosis areas between groups (P=0.0002).

CONCLUSION: LLLT (λ=670 nm) increased the necrotic area of random skin flaps in rats when irradiated with an energy of 2.79 J (100 J/cm(2)).

Keywords: Low-level laser therapy; Necrosis; Rats; Surgical flaps

References

  1. Br J Plast Surg. 2000 Jan;53(1):58-62 - PubMed
  2. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005 Aug;23(4):377-81 - PubMed
  3. Acta Cir Bras. 2012 Feb;27(2):155-61 - PubMed
  4. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 May;27(3):655-60 - PubMed
  5. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980 Feb;65(2):152-8 - PubMed
  6. Ann Plast Surg. 1985 Mar;14(3):278-83 - PubMed
  7. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Jun;28(3):379-84 - PubMed
  8. Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Dec;57(6):670-2 - PubMed
  9. Lasers Med Sci. 2009 Mar;24(2):209-13 - PubMed
  10. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012 Aug;30(8):418-24 - PubMed
  11. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001 Feb;19(1):29-33 - PubMed
  12. Acta Chir Scand. 1966 May;131(5):408-12 - PubMed
  13. Pain. 2006 Sep;124(1-2):201-10 - PubMed
  14. Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Jul;39(6):534-42 - PubMed
  15. Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Jul;37(1):74-7 - PubMed
  16. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Apr;24(2):179-85 - PubMed
  17. Dose Response. 2009 Sep 01;7(4):358-83 - PubMed
  18. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Feb;28(1):57-61 - PubMed
  19. Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Dec;24(6):705-14 - PubMed
  20. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Oct;27(5):721-4 - PubMed
  21. Lasers Med Sci. 2002;17(3):146-53 - PubMed
  22. Ann Plast Surg. 1997 May;38(5):514-7 - PubMed
  23. Ann Plast Surg. 1985 Jan;14(1):64-73 - PubMed
  24. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 Oct-Dec;17(4):307-13 - PubMed
  25. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983 Dec;72(6):766-77 - PubMed
  26. Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol. 2005 Nov-Dec;(6):672-83 - PubMed
  27. Diabetes Care. 1998 Apr;21(4):580-4 - PubMed
  28. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965 Feb;35:177-82 - PubMed
  29. Acta Cir Bras. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):133-8 - PubMed
  30. Acta Cir Bras. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):177-83 - PubMed
  31. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010 Jan-Feb;14(1):45-51 - PubMed
  32. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Jun;27(3):411-6 - PubMed
  33. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992 Feb;89(2):306-10 - PubMed
  34. Wound Repair Regen. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):65-9 - PubMed
  35. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(3):204-11 - PubMed
  36. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;33(5):344-51 - PubMed

Publication Types