Display options
Share it on

Front Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 20;6:52. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00052. eCollection 2015.

Judging Strangers' Trustworthiness is Associated with Theory of Mind Skills.

Frontiers in psychiatry

Marie Prevost, Mathieu Brodeur, Kristine H Onishi, Martin Lepage, Ian Gold

Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada.
  2. Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada.
  3. Department of Psychology , Montreal, QC , Canada.
  4. Department of Philosophy, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada ; Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University , Montreal, QC , Canada.

PMID: 25941495 PMCID: PMC4403288 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00052

Abstract

Trusting people requires evaluating them to assess their trustworthiness. Evaluating a stranger's intentions is likely to be one method of assessing trustworthiness. The present study tested the hypothesis that judgments of trustworthiness are associated with mind reading skills, also called theory of mind (ToM). We tested a group of healthy participants and a group of patients with paranoid schizophrenia. Both groups made ToM judgments and judged the trustworthiness of strangers. Participants were also assessed for their disposition to trust as well as levels of paranoid belief. As anticipated, healthy participants had a normal ToM scores and patients with paranoid schizophrenia had poor ToM scores. In paranoid patients, better ability to read others' minds was associated with judging others as more trustworthy, while the reverse was found in the healthy participants (better mind reading was associated with judging others as less trustworthy), suggesting a non-linear relationship between trust in others and being able to read their intentions.

Keywords: delusions; paranoia; reading the mind in the eyes test; schizophrenia; theory of mind; trust

References

  1. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;64(6):663-7 - PubMed
  2. Schizophr Res. 2010 Dec;124(1-3):81-5 - PubMed
  3. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Mar;5(3):277-83 - PubMed
  4. J Adolesc. 2014 Feb;37(2):175-84 - PubMed
  5. Psychol Med. 2008 Nov;38(11):1577-83 - PubMed
  6. Emotion. 2009 Feb;9(1):128-33 - PubMed
  7. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:208-24 - PubMed
  8. Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(6):590-600 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):592-8 - PubMed
  10. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jul;92(4):909-27 - PubMed
  11. Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):796-803 - PubMed
  12. Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(4):287-93 - PubMed
  13. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001 Nov;21(8):1125-41 - PubMed
  14. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1969 Nov;21(5):581-6 - PubMed
  15. Brain. 2013 Jun;136(Pt 6):1968-75 - PubMed
  16. Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):730-5 - PubMed
  17. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Jul;198(7):516-9 - PubMed
  18. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2002 Aug;8(3):248-56 - PubMed
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105(32):11087-92 - PubMed
  20. Schizophr Res. 2006 Jan 1;81(1):101-11 - PubMed
  21. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Apr;22(4):951-61 - PubMed
  22. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Jan;62(1):129-38 - PubMed
  23. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 May;27(4):425-57 - PubMed
  24. Brain. 2012 Mar;135(Pt 3):976-84 - PubMed
  25. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;191:5-13 - PubMed
  26. Schizophr Res. 2014 Mar;153(1-3):9-17 - PubMed
  27. Schizophr Res. 2007 Jan;89(1-3):101-9 - PubMed
  28. Neuropsychology. 2005 Jul;19(4):494-500 - PubMed
  29. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jul 1;69(1):29-33 - PubMed
  30. Schizophr Res. 2011 Oct;132(1):50-3 - PubMed
  31. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51 - PubMed

Publication Types