Display options
Share it on

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 30;3(1):e25. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3347.

Internet Use and Access Among Pregnant Women via Computer and Mobile Phone: Implications for Delivery of Perinatal Care.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Rachel Peragallo Urrutia, Alexander A Berger, Amber A Ivins, A Jenna Beckham, John M Thorp, Wanda K Nicholson

Affiliations

  1. Division of Women's Primary Healthcare, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

PMID: 25835744 PMCID: PMC4395770 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.3347

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of Internet-based behavioral programs may be an efficient, flexible method to enhance prenatal care and improve pregnancy outcomes. There are few data about access to, and use of, the Internet via computers and mobile phones among pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: We describe pregnant women's access to, and use of, computers, mobile phones, and computer technologies (eg, Internet, blogs, chat rooms) in a southern United States population. We describe the willingness of pregnant women to participate in Internet-supported weight-loss interventions delivered via computers or mobile phones.

METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 100 pregnant women at a tertiary referral center ultrasound clinic in the southeast United States. Data were analyzed using Stata version 10 (StataCorp) and R (R Core Team 2013). Means and frequency procedures were used to describe demographic characteristics, access to computers and mobile phones, and use of specific Internet modalities. Chi-square testing was used to determine whether there were differences in technology access and Internet modality use according to age, race/ethnicity, income, or children in the home. The Fisher's exact test was used to describe preferences to participate in Internet-based postpartum weight-loss interventions via computer versus mobile phone. Logistic regression was used to determine demographic characteristics associated with these preferences.

RESULTS: The study sample was 61.0% white, 26.0% black, 6.0% Hispanic, and 7.0% Asian with a mean age of 31.0 (SD 5.1). Most participants had access to a computer (89/100, 89.0%) or mobile phone (88/100, 88.0%) for at least 8 hours per week. Access remained high (>74%) across age groups, racial/ethnic groups, income levels, and number of children in the home. Internet/Web (94/100, 94.0%), email (90/100, 90.0%), and Facebook (50/100, 50.0%) were the most commonly used Internet technologies. Women aged less than 30 years were more likely to report use of Twitter and chat rooms compared to women 30 years of age or older. Of the participants, 82.0% (82/100) were fairly willing or very willing to participate in postpartum lifestyle intervention. Of the participants, 83.0% (83/100) were fairly willing or very willing to participate in an Internet intervention delivered via computer, while only 49.0% (49/100) were fairly willing or very willing to do so via mobile phone technology. Older women and women with children tended to be less likely to desire a mobile phone-based program.

CONCLUSIONS: There is broad access and use of computer and mobile phone technology among southern US pregnant women with varied demographic characteristics. Pregnant women are willing to participate in Internet-supported perinatal interventions. Our findings can inform the development of computer- and mobile phone-based approaches for the delivery of clinical and educational interventions.

Keywords: Internet; health behavior; mobile phone; postpartum period; pregnancy; risk reduction behavior

References

  1. JAMA. 2001 Mar 7;285(9):1172-7 - PubMed
  2. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 May;41(3):243-54 - PubMed
  3. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 06;10(5):e39 - PubMed
  4. Midwifery. 2009 Feb;25(1):14-20 - PubMed
  5. Am J Public Health. 2012 Dec;102(12):2207-13 - PubMed
  6. Stat Med. 1990 Jul;9(7):811-8 - PubMed
  7. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 16;16(7):e172 - PubMed
  8. Matern Child Health J. 2013 Oct;17(8):1363-72 - PubMed
  9. Diabet Med. 2012 Feb;29(2):278-83 - PubMed
  10. Matern Child Health J. 2008 Jan;12(1):119-27 - PubMed
  11. Midwifery. 2013 Jul;29(7):730-5 - PubMed
  12. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Jul 30;11(3):e24 - PubMed
  13. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Aug 14-28;166(15):1620-5 - PubMed
  14. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 03;16(6):e147 - PubMed
  15. JAMA. 2003 Apr 9;289(14):1833-6 - PubMed
  16. Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 14;167(9):944-9 - PubMed
  17. Health Educ Res. 2003 Apr;18(2):156-70 - PubMed
  18. N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):1959-68 - PubMed
  19. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Nov 16;4:59 - PubMed
  20. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr;87(1):81-92 - PubMed
  21. Womens Health Issues. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):e67-72 - PubMed
  22. Birth. 2011 Dec;38(4):336-45 - PubMed
  23. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:22-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support