Display options
Share it on

Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Apr;19(2):137-9. doi: 10.1188/15.CJON.137-139.

Cancer-related fatigue: scientific progress has been made in 40 years.

Clinical journal of oncology nursing

Ashley Leak Bryant, AnnMarie Lee Walton, Brett Phillips

Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
  2. College of Nursing, University of Utah in Salt Lake City.
  3. UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC.

PMID: 25840376 PMCID: PMC4879585 DOI: 10.1188/15.CJON.137-139

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a distressing, persistent symptom that is experienced by survivors during and after treatment. Unsurprisingly, many early CRF studies were conducted by nurses. These studies included a look at patients receiving localized radiation treatment (Haylock & Hart, 1979); an exploration of fatigue as a conceptual approach to a clinical problem (Aistars, 1987); the development of a nursing theory focused on fatigue mechanisms (Piper, Lindsey, & Dodd, 1987); an examination of fatigue mechanisms (St Pierre, Kasper, & Lindsey, 1992), as well as of fatigue in advanced cancer (Bruera & MacDonald, 1988) and in non-small cell lung cancer (Sarna, 1993); and a description of fatigue and potential nursing interventions (Nail & King, 1987). Winningham et al. (1994) wrote a state-of-the-science article about fatigue in the cancer experience for the Oncology Nursing Forum, and Mock et al. (1997) was one of the first to conduct an exercise study regarding the effects of exercise on fatigue, physical functioning, and emotional distress during radiation therapy for breast cancer. Nurse scholars from the 1970s-2000s were pivotal in advancing the science of fatigue in various cancers and have provided a scientific foundation for those four decades. 
.

Keywords: Putting Evidence Into Practice; cancer-related fatigue; exercise; nutrition

References

  1. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1987 Nov-Dec;14(6):25-30 - PubMed
  2. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):243-74 - PubMed
  3. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Feb;94(2):221-30 - PubMed
  4. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2011;186:367-87 - PubMed
  5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;(8):CD008465 - PubMed
  6. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;93(8):675-86 - PubMed
  7. J Sci Med Sport. 2013 Mar;16(2):99-104 - PubMed
  8. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1997 Jul;24(6):991-1000 - PubMed
  9. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Nov-Dec;56(6):323-53 - PubMed
  10. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):391-410 - PubMed
  11. Semin Oncol Nurs. 1987 Nov;3(4):257-62 - PubMed
  12. Circulation. 1996 Aug 15;94(4):857-62 - PubMed
  13. Cancer Nurs. 1979 Dec;2(6):461-7 - PubMed
  14. Am J Nurs. 1988 Jan;88(1):99-100 - PubMed
  15. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Apr;19(3):419-25 - PubMed
  16. Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1):82-96 - PubMed
  17. Cancer Pract. 2002 Mar-Apr;10(2):66-74 - PubMed
  18. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1994 Jan-Feb;21(1):23-36 - PubMed
  19. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18 Suppl:38-58 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 10;25(17):2345-51 - PubMed
  21. J Adv Nurs. 1993 May;18(5):714-24 - PubMed
  22. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1987 Nov-Dec;14(6):17-23 - PubMed
  23. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998 Jan-Feb;25(1):107-13 - PubMed
  24. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jul;42(7):1409-26 - PubMed
  25. J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Jun;4(2):87-100 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support