Display options
Cite
Shiraguppi VL, B S H, G S C, et al. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root obturated with resilon and gutta-percha using two different techniques: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(3):ZC15-8doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646.
Shiraguppi, V. L., B S, H., G S, C., Desai, N., & Azad, A. (2015). Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root obturated with resilon and gutta-percha using two different techniques: an in vitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 9(3), ZC15-8. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646
Shiraguppi, Vijayakumar L, et al. "Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root obturated with resilon and gutta-percha using two different techniques: an in vitro study." Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR vol. 9,3 (2015): ZC15-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646
Shiraguppi VL, B S H, G S C, Desai N, Azad A. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root obturated with resilon and gutta-percha using two different techniques: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC15-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646. Epub 2015 Mar 01. PMID: 25954697; PMCID: PMC4413147.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):ZC15-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646. Epub 2015 Mar 01.

Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of root obturated with resilon and gutta-percha using two different techniques: an in vitro study.

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR

Vijayakumar L Shiraguppi, Hema B S, Chandu G S, Niranjan Desai, Antriksh Azad

Affiliations

  1. Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, M A Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre , Pune, Maharashtra, India .
  2. Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre , Bhopal, Madhyapradesh, India .
  3. Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre , Bhopal, Madhyapradesh, India .
  4. Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics. Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital , STES Campus, Vadgaon BK Pune 41, Maharashtra, India .
  5. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences& Research centre , Bhopal, Madhyapradesh, India .

PMID: 25954697 PMCID: PMC4413147 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11134.5646

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Present study evaluated the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth filled with Gutta percha and a new resin based obturating material (Resilon).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 freshly extracted Mandibular premolar with fully formed apices were selected and decoronated at cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). Teeth were divided into Group A and Group B of 75 teeth each. In Group A canals were prepared up to # no 40 K file and Group B up to #no 80 K file. Both the groups were sub divided into five group of 15 teeth each as control group (unfilled canals), lateral condensation with Gutta-percha using AH 26 sealer, vertical condensation with Gutta-percha using AH 26 sealer, lateral condensation with Resilon using resilon sealer, vertical condensation with Resilon using resilon sealer. Each specimen was subjected to compressive load using Universal testing machine. The force required to fracture was recorded and data were analysed by ANOVA, Duncan's test and student T test.

RESULT: The result showed that there is statistically significant difference among experimental groups (p < 0.05). The groups with the Resilon material displayed higher mean fracture loads than the Gutta percha groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between different preparation techniques.

CONCLUSION: Obturating the canals with the new resin-based obturation material increases the in vitro fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth when compared with standard Gutta percha techniques.

Keywords: Endodontic treatment; Lateral condensation; Obturation

References

  1. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 May;135(5):646-52 - PubMed
  2. J Endod. 1978 Nov;4(11):341-5 - PubMed
  3. J Endod. 2003 Aug;29(8):523-8 - PubMed
  4. J Endod. 1992 Sep;18(9):440-3 - PubMed
  5. J Endod. 2004 Jun;30(6):436-40 - PubMed
  6. J Endod. 2002 Mar;28(3):217-9 - PubMed
  7. J Endod. 2007 Jun;33(6):732-6 - PubMed
  8. Arch Oral Biol. 1993 Jul;38(7):541-6 - PubMed
  9. J Endod. 1997 Aug;23(8):533-4 - PubMed
  10. Int Endod J. 1999 Sep;32(5):376-80 - PubMed
  11. Int Endod J. 1996 Mar;29(2):76-83 - PubMed
  12. Acta Odontol Scand. 1986 Oct;44(5):271-7 - PubMed
  13. Iran Endod J. 2010 Summer;5(3):117-20 - PubMed
  14. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983 Sep;107(3):413-9 - PubMed
  15. J Endod. 2004 Feb;30(2):103-6 - PubMed
  16. J Endod. 2007 Apr;33(4):391-8 - PubMed
  17. J Endod. 1987 Jun;13(6):277-84 - PubMed
  18. J Endod. 2000 Jan;26(1):42-4 - PubMed
  19. J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):529-32 - PubMed
  20. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1972 Oct;34(4):661-70 - PubMed
  21. Iran Endod J. 2013 Summer;8(3):136-9 - PubMed
  22. J Endod. 1983 Dec;9(12):544-50 - PubMed
  23. J Endod. 1995 Jun;21(6):314-20 - PubMed
  24. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1980 Mar;49(3):243-53 - PubMed
  25. J Endod. 1999 Feb;25(2):99-104 - PubMed
  26. J Endod. 1989 Nov;15(11):512-6 - PubMed
  27. J Endod. 2002 Sep;28(9):658-64 - PubMed
  28. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1995 Oct;11(5):214-9 - PubMed
  29. J Endod. 1995 Feb;21(2):57-61 - PubMed
  30. Int Endod J. 1998 Mar;31(2):103-11 - PubMed
  31. J Endod. 1991 Sep;17(9):450-6 - PubMed
  32. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Apr;67(4):458-67 - PubMed

Publication Types