Display options
Share it on

Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2015 May;38(5):117. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2015-15032-5. Epub 2015 May 12.

Response of a polymer network to the motion of a rigid sphere.

The European physical journal. E, Soft matter

Haim Diamant

Affiliations

  1. Raymond & Beverly Sackler School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel, [email protected].

PMID: 25957176 DOI: 10.1140/epje/i2015-15032-5

Abstract

In view of recent microrheology experiments we re-examine the problem of a rigid sphere oscillating inside a dilute polymer network. The network and its solvent are treated using the two-fluid model. We show that the dynamics of the medium can be decomposed into two independent incompressible flows. The first, dominant at large distances and obeying the Stokes equation, corresponds to the collective flow of the two components as a whole. The other, governing the dynamics over an intermediate range of distances and following the Brinkman equation, describes the flow of the network and solvent relative to one another. The crossover between these two regions occurs at a dynamic length scale which is much larger than the network's mesh size. The analysis focuses on the spatial structure of the medium's response and the role played by the dynamic crossover length. We examine different boundary conditions at the sphere surface. The large-distance collective flow is shown to be independent of boundary conditions and network compressibility, establishing the robustness of two-point microrheology at large separations. The boundary conditions that fit the experimental results for inert spheres in entangled F-actin networks are those of a free network, which does not interact directly with the sphere. Closed-form expressions and scaling relations are derived, allowing for the extraction of material parameters from a combination of one- and two-point microrheology. We discuss a basic deficiency of the two-fluid model and a way to bypass it when analyzing microrheological data.

References

  1. Phys Rev Lett. 2009 May 8;102(18):188303 - PubMed
  2. Biophys J. 2000 Dec;79(6):3258-66 - PubMed
  3. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Jan;65(1 Pt 1):011501 - PubMed
  4. Phys Rev Lett. 2008 Jan 11;100(1):018104 - PubMed
  5. Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Mar 14;90(10):108301 - PubMed
  6. Soft Matter. 2014 Nov 7;10(41):8324-9 - PubMed
  7. Biophys J. 2004 Jun;86(6):4004-14 - PubMed
  8. Phys Rev Lett. 2003 Oct 10;91(15):158302 - PubMed
  9. Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Aug 21;85(8):1774-7 - PubMed
  10. Faraday Discuss. 2003;123:323-34; discussion 401-21 - PubMed
  11. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2008 Dec;78(6 Pt 1):061503 - PubMed
  12. Phys Rev Lett. 1995 Feb 13;74(7):1250-1253 - PubMed
  13. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1993 Nov;48(5):3674-3691 - PubMed
  14. Biophys J. 2014 May 6;106(9):1871-81 - PubMed
  15. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Apr;63(4 Pt 1):041510 - PubMed
  16. Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Jul 24;85(4):888-91 - PubMed

Publication Types