Display options
Share it on

Sex Health. 2015 Jun;12(3):272-5. doi: 10.1071/SH14211.

A comparison of self-reported sexual risk behaviours between US civilian and active duty military women.

Sexual health

Shauna Stahlman, Marjan Javanbakht, Susan Cochran, Steven Shoptaw, Alison B Hamilton, Pamina M Gorbach

Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
  2. Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.
  3. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA.

PMID: 25844558 PMCID: PMC4596744 DOI: 10.1071/SH14211

Abstract

Women in the US military report a high prevalence of sexual risk behaviours, such as binge drinking and new or multiple sexual partnerships. However, demographical differences pose challenges to making comparisons with civilians. Two public-use datasets were used to compare prevalence of sexual risk behaviours between sexually active military and civilian women, after adjusting for demographic factors. It was found that women in the military reported a higher prevalence of binge drinking and new/multiple sexual partners as compared with civilians, which suggests that military women are a high-risk group and the military environment may at least partially facilitate these risk behaviours.

References

  1. Mil Med. 2010 Jun;175(6):390-9 - PubMed
  2. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2008 Jul;34(3):165-8 - PubMed
  3. J Drug Educ. 2009;39(1):1-21 - PubMed
  4. Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):128-36 - PubMed
  5. Qual Health Res. 2008 Feb;18(2):244-53 - PubMed
  6. Mil Med. 2008 Nov;173(11):1078-84 - PubMed
  7. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Nov;21(11):1155-69 - PubMed
  8. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):105-13 - PubMed
  9. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 10;339(11):739-44 - PubMed
  10. Mil Med. 2013 Jan;178(1):37-42 - PubMed
  11. Sex Transm Dis. 2014 Jun;41(6):359-64 - PubMed
  12. Sex Transm Dis. 2012 Feb;39(2):92-6 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support