Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 May 07;3(4):e373. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000342. eCollection 2015 Apr.
One-flap Palatoplasty: A Cohort Study to Evaluate a Technique for Unilateral Cleft Palate Repair.
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
Percy Rossell-Perry, Omar Cotrinal-Rabanal, Evelyn Caceres-Nano
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Post Graduate Studies, Faculty of Medicine, San Martin de Porres University, Lima, Peru; Padre Tezza Clinic, Lima, Peru; ARMONIZAR Foundation, Lima, PerĂº; and School of Pedagogic Training of Lima, Lima, Peru.
PMID: 25973351
PMCID: PMC4422204 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000342
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2-flap palatoplasty technique is actually the approach most commonly used in the United States for cleft palate repair. This is a one-time surgery that enables closure under minimal tension, lowering rates of subsequent fistula development. However, its primary disadvantage is potential detriment to maxillary growth (due to extent of dissection on both sides of the cleft and raw lateral surfaces). Since 2007, a surgical technique using only one mucoperiosteal flap from the noncleft side has been performed by us, reducing the extent of the surgery and its potential nondesirable effects over the palate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of this technique for unilateral cleft palate repair.
METHODS: This is a retrospective, simple-blinded cohort study between 2 groups of 120 patients each with unilateral cleft palate who were operated on using the 2-flap and 1-flap techniques by the Outreach Surgical Center Program Lima from 2007 to 2012. Data collection was accomplished by physical examination to evaluate the presence or absence of a fistula and to evaluate the presence of hypernasality. Postoperative bleeding was also studied.
RESULTS: We have observed no increase in the rate of fistulas and velopharyngeal insufficiency between these 2 studied groups (P = 0.801 and P = 1.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a 1-flap technique for unilateral cleft palate repair allowed us to achieve results comparable to those of a 2-flap technique in terms of postoperative fistula development and hypernasal speech. Additional studies are required to evaluate the effect of this technique on palatal growth.
References
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Jan;44(1):13-22 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1542-8 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Sep;124(3):899-906 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 May;125(5):1503-10 - PubMed
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 May;46(3):305-13 - PubMed
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 May;43(3):272-88 - PubMed
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Nov;42(6):594-600 - PubMed
- Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;51(2):144-8 - PubMed
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Sep;43(5):547-56 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1515-8 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Aug;98(2):236-46 - PubMed
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Jan;45(1):1-17 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Jul;118(1):193-204 - PubMed
- Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Apr;76(4):406-10 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):2216-21 - PubMed
- JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):206-10 - PubMed
- Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2005;39(5):287-9 - PubMed
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010 Nov;47(6):623-30 - PubMed
- Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;51(8):851-7 - PubMed
- J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2014 Apr;48(2):132-5 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jul;122(1):232-9 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Dec;78(6):739-47 - PubMed
- Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 May;48(3):244-51 - PubMed
- J Craniofac Surg. 1999 Nov;10(6):503-18 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987 Oct;80(4):518-24 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1644-8 - PubMed
- Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Jun;87(6):1041-7 - PubMed
Publication Types