Display options
Share it on

Asian Spine J. 2015 Jun;9(3):423-6. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.423. Epub 2015 Jun 08.

Optimal Timing of Preoperative Skin Preparation with Povidone-Iodine for Spine Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

Asian spine journal

Tatsuya Yasuda, Tomohiko Hasegawa, Yu Yamato, Sho Kobayashi, Daisuke Togawa, Hideyuki Arima, Yukihiro Matsuyama

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

PMID: 26097658 PMCID: PMC4472591 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.423

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two techniques of skin preparation with povidone-iodine.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Preoperative skin preparation is important for preventing surgical site infection by reducing the bacteria in the surgical area. Povidone-iodine is a commonly used agent for preoperative skin preparation, and further decrease in surgical site infections can be expected by understanding how to apply it more effectively.

METHODS: Eighty-nine spine surgery patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In group A, povidone-iodine was applied to the surgical site just before starting the operation; in group B, povidone-iodine was applied several minutes prior to starting the operation and was allowed to dry. We collected samples from the wound edge before suturing, and we compared the rates of positive culture between the two groups.

RESULTS: The rate of positive culture was 30.2% (13 out of 43 patients) in group A, and 6.5% (3 out of 46 patients) in group B. This indicates that there was a significant difference in postoperative infection rates between group A and group B.

CONCLUSIONS: Because bacteria on the skin appeared significantly reduced by allowing povidone-iodine to dry for several minutes prior to surgery, we recommend this approach to reduce the incidence of postoperative infections.

Keywords: Infection; Povidone-iodine; Surgical wound

References

  1. Rev Urol. 2009 Fall;11(4):190-5 - PubMed
  2. Eplasty. 2008 Jul 16;8:e35 - PubMed
  3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973 Oct;(96):222-33 - PubMed
  4. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Mar;218(3):336-44 - PubMed
  5. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 1;35(13):1323-8 - PubMed
  6. J Neurosurg. 2003 Mar;98(2 Suppl):149-55 - PubMed
  7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Sep 15;21(18):2163-9 - PubMed
  8. J Spinal Disord. 1995 Aug;8(4):278-83 - PubMed
  9. Orthop Clin North Am. 1972 Mar;3(1):99-111 - PubMed
  10. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):18-26 - PubMed
  11. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jun;12(6):1017-21 - PubMed
  12. Surg Neurol. 2009 Feb;71(2):207-10; discussion 210 - PubMed
  13. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 May;16(5):576-9 - PubMed
  14. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Feb 1;23(3):366-70 - PubMed
  15. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):310-3 - PubMed
  16. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):578-83 - PubMed
  17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1434-6; discussion 1436-7 - PubMed
  18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973 Jun;(93):225-34 - PubMed

Publication Types