Display options
Share it on

Evaluation (Lond). 2014 Oct;20(4):471-491. doi: 10.1177/1356389014551484.

Strengthening patient-centred communication in rural Ugandan health centres: A theory-driven evaluation within a cluster randomized trial.

Evaluation (London, England : 1995)

Susan Nayiga, Deborah DiLiberto, Lilian Taaka, Christine Nabirye, Ane Haaland, Sarah G Staedke, Clare I R Chandler

Affiliations

  1. Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Uganda.
  2. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
  3. University of Oslo, Norway.

PMID: 25983612 PMCID: PMC4425297 DOI: 10.1177/1356389014551484

Abstract

This article describes a theory-driven evaluation of one component of an intervention to improve the quality of health care at Ugandan public health centres. Patient-centred services have been advocated widely, but such approaches have received little attention in Africa. A cluster randomized trial is evaluating population-level outcomes of an intervention with multiple components, including 'patient-centred services.' A process evaluation was designed within this trial to articulate and evaluate the implementation and programme theories of the intervention. This article evaluates one hypothesized mechanism of change within the programme theory: the impact of the Patient Centred Services component on health-worker communication. The theory-driven approach extended to evaluation of the outcome measures. The study found that the proximal outcome of patient-centred communication was rated 10 percent higher (

Keywords: Africa; complex intervention; patient centred communication; quality of health care; theory-driven evaluation

References

  1. Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Dec 1;89(12):907-12 - PubMed
  2. BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1561-3 - PubMed
  3. Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):60-8 - PubMed
  4. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Apr;82(4):672-7 - PubMed
  5. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509-16 - PubMed
  6. JAMA. 2009 Sep 23;302(12):1284-93 - PubMed
  7. Malar J. 2012 Feb 23;11:55 - PubMed
  8. Lancet. 2004 Oct 30-Nov 5;364(9445):1595-602 - PubMed
  9. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Dec;79(6):826-33 - PubMed
  10. Health Policy Plan. 1995 Mar;10(1):71-8 - PubMed
  11. Hum Resour Health. 2013 Mar 22;11:13 - PubMed
  12. Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 30;8:113 - PubMed
  13. Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Jan-Feb;24(1):40-9 - PubMed
  14. Implement Sci. 2009 Jul 16;4:40 - PubMed
  15. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jun;36(11):1397-405 - PubMed
  16. Acad Med. 2006 May;81(5):463-7 - PubMed
  17. Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 30;8:114 - PubMed
  18. Health Psychol. 1993 Mar;12(2):140-6 - PubMed
  19. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Aug;11(4):319-28 - PubMed
  20. Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):1026-35 - PubMed
  21. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Oct;14(4):595-621 - PubMed
  22. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(7):1516-28 - PubMed
  23. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2299-306 - PubMed
  24. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;9(2):155-64 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):444-5 - PubMed
  26. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD003267 - PubMed
  27. BMJ. 2010 Aug 13;341:c3852 - PubMed
  28. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Oct;51(7):1087-110 - PubMed
  29. BMC Public Health. 2005 Dec 22;5:140 - PubMed
  30. CMAJ. 1995 May 1;152(9):1423-33 - PubMed
  31. Health Policy Plan. 2001 Sep;16 Suppl 1:19-23 - PubMed
  32. Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1400-1 - PubMed
  33. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):337-64 - PubMed
  34. Med Care. 1980 Nov;18(11):1146-57 - PubMed
  35. BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6 - PubMed
  36. Patient Educ Couns. 2000 Jan;39(1):129-45 - PubMed
  37. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):10-8 - PubMed

Publication Types