Display options
Share it on

Arab J Urol. 2014 Mar;12(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Sep 16.

Training in ureteroscopy for urolithiasis.

Arab journal of urology

Christian Seitz, Harun Fajkovic

Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

PMID: 26019922 PMCID: PMC4434440 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.010

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide an insight into the current status of semi-rigid and flexible ureteroscopy, following new curricula for training methods, including training with models, virtual reality and active mentoring.

METHODS: We systematically reviewed previous reports, including articles in English identified using the following strategy: ('ureteroscopy'[Mesh]) or ('urolithiasis'[Mesh]) AND ('education'[Mesh]), or ('teaching'[Mesh]). Abstracts submitted at congresses were not included. Relevant articles that were identified as references in the retrieved articles were also included.

RESULTS: The terms ('urolithiasis'[Mesh] AND 'education'[Mesh]) retrieved 106 articles, of which five were included. The terms ('urolithiasis'[Mesh] AND 'teaching'[Mesh]) retrieved six articles, of which three were included. The terms ('ureteroscopy'[Mesh] AND 'education'[Mesh]) retrieved 29 articles, of which 21 were included. The terms ('ureteroscopy'[Mesh] AND 'teaching'[Mesh]) retrieved eight articles, of which seven were included. Remaining articles were found in the reference section of retrieved articles. Finally, 43 articles were included. Four randomised controlled trials with level 1b evidence were included. Currently there is no standard teaching method for ureteroscopy and the number of cases to reach competence has not yet been defined. However, simulation-based training has been shown to be effective, cost-effective, and to increase patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS: Simulators lead to a more rapid acquisition of skills in ureteroscopy than do conventional training methods, and improve the performance of future surgeons. Flexible ureteroscopy simulators are a promising tool for training, and have the advantage of minimising the need for learning the procedures on patients. A didactic and clinical curriculum, including surgical videotape reviews as well as operative mentoring, enables a rapid progression in already experienced endourologists. However, there are few reports specifically addressing the skills necessary for training.

Keywords: (f)URS, (flexibe) ureteroscopy; GRS, global rating scale; Learning curve; Lithotripsy; OCEBM, Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; RCT, randomised controlled trial; TCT, task completion time; Training; Ureteroscopy; Urolithiasis; VR, virtual reality

References

  1. J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2152-6 - PubMed
  2. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Nov;195(5):675-81 - PubMed
  3. Urol Int. 2001;66(1):30-2 - PubMed
  4. BJU Int. 2001 Nov;88(7):661-5 - PubMed
  5. J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):26-34 - PubMed
  6. J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Sep;201(3):454-7 - PubMed
  7. BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1698-702 - PubMed
  8. J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1346-9 - PubMed
  9. J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1690-9 - PubMed
  10. J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):1928-32 - PubMed
  11. Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):536-46 - PubMed
  12. J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):673-7 - PubMed
  13. Eur Urol. 2005 Sep;48(3):458-63; discussion 463 - PubMed
  14. Int J Urol. 2006 Jul;13(7):896-901 - PubMed
  15. BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):518-23 - PubMed
  16. BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95(9):1276-9 - PubMed
  17. Curr Urol Rep. 2006 Mar;7(2):107-13 - PubMed
  18. J Endourol. 2009 Jun;23(6):903-5 - PubMed
  19. J Endourol. 2007 Mar;21(3):263-9 - PubMed
  20. J Endourol. 2009 Jul;23(7):1175-81 - PubMed
  21. J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):667-71 - PubMed
  22. J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1243-7 - PubMed
  23. J Endourol. 2001 Feb;15(1):117-22 - PubMed
  24. Curr Opin Urol. 2002 May;12(3):209-15 - PubMed
  25. BJU Int. 2004 Aug;94(3):255-7 - PubMed
  26. Eur Urol. 2002 Aug;42(2):175-9; discussion 180 - PubMed
  27. J Endourol. 2007 Mar;21(3):244-7 - PubMed
  28. J Endourol. 2010 Apr;24(4):621-8 - PubMed
  29. Patient Saf Surg. 2008 Jun 11;2:16 - PubMed
  30. Acad Med. 1996 Dec;71(12):1363-5 - PubMed
  31. J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):146-50 - PubMed
  32. BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6):798-805; discussion 805 - PubMed
  33. Eur Urol. 2008 Dec;54(6):1247-61 - PubMed
  34. J Endourol. 2006 Apr;20(4):266-71 - PubMed
  35. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):1012-7 - PubMed
  36. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;29:157-63 - PubMed
  37. Clin Nephrol. 2013 Feb;79(2):132-5 - PubMed
  38. Am J Surg. 2006 Jun;191(6):817-20 - PubMed
  39. J Urol. 2004 Jan;171(1):320-3; discussion 323 - PubMed
  40. Urologe A. 1996 May;35(3):226-32 - PubMed
  41. J Urol. 2001 Oct;166(4):1261-6 - PubMed
  42. BJU Int. 2002 Feb;89(3):174-7 - PubMed

Publication Types