Display options
Share it on

Assessment. 2016 Jun;23(3):279-91. doi: 10.1177/1073191115583714. Epub 2015 May 18.

The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.

Assessment

Eunike Wetzel, Oliver Lüdtke, Ingo Zettler, Jan R Böhnke

Affiliations

  1. University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany [email protected].
  2. Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Kiel, Germany Center for International Student Assessment, Germany.
  3. Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  4. Mental Health and Addiction Research Group (MHARG), Hull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

PMID: 25986062 DOI: 10.1177/1073191115583714

Abstract

This study investigated the stability of extreme response style (ERS) and acquiescence response style (ARS) over a period of 8 years. ERS and ARS were measured with item sets drawn randomly from a large pool of items used in an ongoing German panel study. Latent-trait-state-occasion and latent-state models were applied to test the relationship between time-specific (state) response style behaviors and time-invariant trait components of response styles. The results show that across different random item samples, on average between 49% and 59% of the variance in the state response style factors was explained by the trait response style factors. This indicates that the systematic differences respondents show in their preferences for certain response categories are remarkably stable over a period of 8 years. The stability of ERS and ARS implies that it is important to consider response styles in the analysis of self-report data from polytomous rating scales, especially in longitudinal studies aimed at investigating stability in substantive traits. Furthermore, the stability of response styles raises the question in how far they might be considered trait-like latent variables themselves that could be of substantive interest.

© The Author(s) 2015.

Keywords: TOSCA; acquiescence; extreme response style; latent-state model; latent-trait-state-occasion model; response styles

MeSH terms

Publication Types